Odd issue with C6 and NIS
I seem to have this very odd issue with CentOS 6 WRT NIS. I have taken the package selection that I used with CentOS 5 and basically plopped it into my C6 kickstart file (see below). On C5 this works just fine and I'm able to log in with NIS credentials just fine. However, it looks like on C6 if you use a package selection like this, you also need to specify the yp-tools package as part of the kickstart *even though* you specify an authentication method of NIS in the kickstart. Seems like a bug to me?!?
auth --useshadow --enablemd5 --enablenis --nisdomain test --nisserver yp.example.com %packages @core augeas autofs dstat nfs-utils ntp openssh openssh-clients openssh-server portreserve puppet redhat-lsb rsh-server sendmail sendmail-cf sudo sysstat tcp_wrappers wget xinetd yum-utils %end -- James A. Peltier IT Services - Research Computing Group Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpeltier@sfu.ca Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier I will do the best I can with the talent I have _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd issue with C6 and NIS
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:55 PM, James A. Peltier <jpeltier@sfu.ca> wrote:
> I seem to have this very odd issue with CentOS 6 WRT NIS. I have taken the > package selection that I used with CentOS 5 and basically plopped it into my > C6 kickstart file (see below). On C5 this works just fine and I'm able to > log in with NIS credentials just fine. However, it looks like on C6 if you > use a package selection like this, you also need to specify the yp-tools > package as part of the kickstart *even though* you specify an authentication > method of NIS in the kickstart. Seems like a bug to me?!? > Current versions of fedora do this as well, in addition to f15 having a buggy startup script for yp*. I agree with you that if you specify auth, the tools for it should be there. That said, NIS needs to die. Quickly. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd issue with C6 and NIS
On 09/27/2011 11:55 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> I seem to have this very odd issue with CentOS 6 WRT NIS. I have taken the package selection that I used with CentOS 5 and basically plopped it into my C6 kickstart file (see below). On C5 this works just fine and I'm able to log in with NIS credentials just fine. However, it looks like on C6 if you use a package selection like this, you also need to specify the yp-tools package as part of the kickstart *even though* you specify an authentication method of NIS in the kickstart. Seems like a bug to me?!? since you mention nis, i'll guess you use automount as well. so be warned that centos 6 has some issues with automount. if automount requests are made rapidly (like on a mail server delivery to a large alias), it will quickly start failing to mount directories and get stuck that way for minutes. i don't have access to r*dh*t box to determine if this has been fixed with all the 6.1 updates. needless to say i can't roll out centos 6 yet. i have filed a centos bug (4984), but since i can't compare against upstream, i don't know for sure where the problem lies. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd issue with C6 and NIS
Hi Joe,
Le 29/09/2011 18:18, Joe Pruett a écrit : > since you mention nis, i'll guess you use automount as well. so be > warned that centos 6 has some issues with automount. if automount > requests are made rapidly (like on a mail server delivery to a large > alias), it will quickly start failing to mount directories and get stuck > that way for minutes. i don't have access to r*dh*t box to determine if > this has been fixed with all the 6.1 updates. needless to say i can't > roll out centos 6 yet. Did you try to install the CentOS 6 CR repo (continuous releaes), which brings to 6.0 the updates from 6.1 ? See : https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=33458&forum=53 See if it solves the problem. Alain -- ================================================== ======== Alain Péan - LPP/CNRS Administrateur Système/Réseau Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas - UMR 7648 Observatoire de Saint-Maur 4, av de Neptune, Bat. A 94100 Saint-Maur des Fossés Tel : 01-45-11-42-39 - Fax : 01-48-89-44-33 ================================================== ======== _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd issue with C6 and NIS
On 09/29/2011 09:23 AM, Alain Péan wrote:
> Hi Joe, > > Le 29/09/2011 18:18, Joe Pruett a écrit : >> since you mention nis, i'll guess you use automount as well. so be >> warned that centos 6 has some issues with automount. if automount >> requests are made rapidly (like on a mail server delivery to a large >> alias), it will quickly start failing to mount directories and get stuck >> that way for minutes. i don't have access to r*dh*t box to determine if >> this has been fixed with all the 6.1 updates. needless to say i can't >> roll out centos 6 yet. > Did you try to install the CentOS 6 CR repo (continuous releaes), which > brings to 6.0 the updates from 6.1 ? See : > https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=33458&forum=53 > > See if it solves the problem. sorry, forgot to mention that i have applied the cr updates. but i don't think the cr has everything from 6.1 yet (no new kernel, which i'd guess there will be). since the devs are still having issues with getting 6.1 to fully compile, i expect more packages to show up. there was an autofs update, but that didn't help the situation. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd issue with C6 and NIS
In article <CALSzgHHTWLD-rW1tQ+Z+EUGK+wRRC47ygg31+FC2TrPYp-yZWQ@mail.gmail.com>, Jim Perrin <centos@centos.org> wrote:
>... >Current versions of fedora do this as well, in addition to f15 having a >buggy startup script for yp*. I agree with you that if you specify auth, the >tools for it should be there. > >That said, NIS needs to die. Quickly. Why? I'll grant NIS is insecure at best for login auth, and should not be used for that purpose (at least not outside the lab). But for other purposes e.g. automount maps, NIS is simple and easy and still functional. I'll also readily agree I wouldn't want NIS on internet-facing systems, but for things like automount maps on the internal corporate LAN, is it really a catastropic problem? Cheers, sr. -- || Steve Rikli ||| || || Systems Administrator ||| How can something that is almost 3 MB || || Genyosha Networks ||| in size be called a "kernel"? || || sr@genyosha.net ||| || _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd issue with C6 and NIS
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Steve Rikli wrote:
> Why? I'll grant NIS is insecure at best for login auth, and should not > be used for that purpose (at least not outside the lab). > > But for other purposes e.g. automount maps, NIS is simple and easy and > still functional. > > I'll also readily agree I wouldn't want NIS on internet-facing systems, > but for things like automount maps on the internal corporate LAN, is > it really a catastropic problem? The problem you get is when you compare it with LDAP. jh _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd issue with C6 and NIS
----- Original Message -----
| On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Steve Rikli wrote: | | > Why? I'll grant NIS is insecure at best for login auth, and should | > not | > be used for that purpose (at least not outside the lab). | > | > But for other purposes e.g. automount maps, NIS is simple and easy | > and | > still functional. | > | > I'll also readily agree I wouldn't want NIS on internet-facing | > systems, | > but for things like automount maps on the internal corporate LAN, is | > it really a catastropic problem? | | The problem you get is when you compare it with LDAP. | | jh There is no comparison. NIS is *much* faster than LDAP for these purposes. -- James A. Peltier IT Services - Research Computing Group Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpeltier@sfu.ca Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier I will do the best I can with the talent I have _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd issue with C6 and NIS
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, James A. Peltier wrote:
> | The problem you get is when you compare it with LDAP. > | > | jh > > There is no comparison. NIS is *much* faster than LDAP for these purposes. And slow (and let's put it into context here, not *that* slow) performance of automount map resolution bites your setup how? jh _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Odd issue with C6 and NIS
In article <alpine.LRH.2.00.1110060937180.9689@pfcpm187.yrrqf .np.hx>, John Hodrien <centos@centos.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Steve Rikli wrote: > >> ... >> I'll also readily agree I wouldn't want NIS on internet-facing systems, >> but for things like automount maps on the internal corporate LAN, is >> it really a catastropic problem? > >The problem you get is when you compare it with LDAP. Compare in what way? What characteristics are you contrasting? I'm genuinely trying to understand the problem you're talking about for the case I've presented, and pro-con from someone who has done both would be appreciated. Thanks, sr. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:47 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.