6.1 Update request
 

Hi devs,

If/when someone has a few minutes, could someone post an update on 6.1
on http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog ?. I suspect the devs have been
busy with the just-released 5.7 version. :)

--
Digimer
E-Mail: digimer@alteeve.com
Freenode handle: digimer
Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org
"At what point did we forget that the Space Shuttle was, essentially,
a program that strapped human beings to an explosion and tried to stab
through the sky with fire and math?"
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

6.1 Update request
 

On 09/14/2011 10:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> If/when someone has a few minutes, could someone post an update on 6.1
> on http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog ?. I suspect the devs have been
> busy with the just-released 5.7 version. :)
>

unless someone else gets to it before me, I will get together a plan and
post it up there ( but not today and perhaps not tomorrow either ).

Step-1, get the major security stuff into 6.0/cr/.

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

6.1 Update request
 

On 09/14/2011 07:32 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/14/2011 10:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> If/when someone has a few minutes, could someone post an update on 6.1
>> on http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog ?. I suspect the devs have been
>> busy with the just-released 5.7 version. :)
>>
>
> unless someone else gets to it before me, I will get together a plan and
> post it up there ( but not today and perhaps not tomorrow either ).
>
> Step-1, get the major security stuff into 6.0/cr/.
>
> - KB

No rush, and thanks for the update. :)

--
Digimer
E-Mail: digimer@alteeve.com
Freenode handle: digimer
Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org
"At what point did we forget that the Space Shuttle was, essentially,
a program that strapped human beings to an explosion and tried to stab
through the sky with fire and math?"
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

6.1 Update request
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 7:32 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Update request
>
> On 09/14/2011 10:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > If/when someone has a few minutes, could someone post an
> update on
> > 6.1 on http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog ?. I suspect the
> devs have
> > been busy with the just-released 5.7 version. :)
> >
>
> unless someone else gets to it before me, I will get together
> a plan and post it up there ( but not today and perhaps not
> tomorrow either ).
>
> Step-1, get the major security stuff into 6.0/cr/.
>
> - KB

Just ordered a Lenovo TS130. I think there are some issues with the Intel
graphics with 6.0 and I saw where they are resolved in 6.1. Hopefully 6.1
can be released soon. If not, I can install Scientific Linux temporarily.

Fingers crossed!!

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

6.1 Update request
 

> Step-1, get the major security stuff into 6.0/cr/.

Sounds good!
Thanks for the update.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

6.1 Update request
 

On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Thomas Dukes wrote:

> Just ordered a Lenovo TS130. I think there are some issues with the Intel
> graphics with 6.0 and I saw where they are resolved in 6.1. Hopefully 6.1
> can be released soon. If not, I can install Scientific Linux temporarily.
>
> Fingers crossed!!

Or, just grab the intel xorg driver rpm from SL, and libdrm, and one other
package, the nouveau rpm. It doesn't make sense to go all the way over to SL
if you plan on coming straight back.

jh
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

6.1 Update request
 

Dne 15.9.2011 9:22, Mathieu Baudier napsal(a):
> Sounds good! Thanks for the update.

No it does not. Since cr repo breaks Spacewalk management.
DH

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

6.1 Update request
 

On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, David Hrbáč wrote:


Dne 15.9.2011 9:22, Mathieu Baudier napsal(a):

Sounds good! Thanks for the update.


No it does not. Since cr repo breaks Spacewalk management.


Breaks it how?

jh_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

6.1 Update request
 

Dne 15.9.2011 10:36, John Hodrien napsal(a):
> Breaks it how?
>
> jh

So, cr should be used only during shift phase.
DH
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

6.1 Update request
 

On 09/15/2011 04:46 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
> Dne 15.9.2011 10:36, John Hodrien napsal(a):
>> Breaks it how?
>>
>> jh
>
> So, cr should be used only during shift phase.

CR is a totally optional repo ... it is something we can do for people
who want to use it.

For people who do not want it ... that is fine too, they can wait for
the main line release.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos