On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 01:31:17AM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Keith Keller wrote on Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:05:01 -0800:
> > grub's menu.lst
> sure, you don't mean grub.conf? grub.conf seems to be the "official" conf.
A-ha! Yes, you are indeed correct. I suspect that my kickstart %post
section removed the symlink and created a new menu.lst file, whereas on my
other system menu.lst is still a symlink because I never attempted to
mangle it. (I used a perl one-liner to modify menu.lst, and I've tested
that perl -pi does remove a symlink to make a new file.)
> Also, I wonder if you really want to comment *out* hiddenmenu?
Yep. I really like to see everything!
Thanks for the pointer--I will be sure to use grub.conf in the future.
CentOS mailing list