Cnetos 5.4 ext3 question...
On Dec 28, 2009, at 11:34 PM, Les Mikesell <email@example.com>
> Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Dec 28, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Les Mikesell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>> Did linux ever get a working fsync() or does it still flush the
>>> filesystem buffer?
>> Working, meaning reliable, or the ability to sync a memory range
>> instead of the whole file system? There is sync_page_range() to only
>> sync only a range, but I think the biggest issue is whether it
>> actually assures it makes it to disk or just out of memory.
> I mean the ability to sync only the buffer associated with the
> single file
> specified by the file descriptor in the argument - without waiting
> for a bunch
> of other unrelated and irrelevant data to sync along with it.
I'm pretty sure it just flushes the data associated with the file
CentOS mailing list