unverified files in 5.4
Hey, Gang!
To ensure that a file hasn't been corrupted or tampered with, you can use rpm to verify the package it came from. Well, I found this: rpm -Vv util-linux .... ........ /usr/bin/cal S.?..... /usr/bin/chfn ........ /usr/bin/chrt S.?..... /usr/bin/chsh .... Does anyone else get this? And what would be the proper course of action at this point? Thanks mucho. -- Without music, life would be a mistake. --Friedrich Nietzsche _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
unverified files in 5.4
On Friday 18 December 2009, ken wrote:
> Hey, Gang! > > To ensure that a file hasn't been corrupted or tampered with, you can > use rpm to verify the package it came from. Well, I found this: > > > rpm -Vv util-linux > .... > ........ /usr/bin/cal > S.?..... /usr/bin/chfn > ........ /usr/bin/chrt > S.?..... /usr/bin/chsh I didn't see this on a clean install, but.. S means size differs from rpmdb entry, ? means the md5sum test could not be done. I'm guessing interference from prelink. If you can, turn it off(*) and re-run the test. (*) change to "PRELINKING=no" in /etc/sysconfig/prelink and run /etc/cron.daily/prelink. /Peter _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
unverified files in 5.4
On 12/18/2009 10:53 AM Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Friday 18 December 2009, ken wrote: >> Hey, Gang! >> >> To ensure that a file hasn't been corrupted or tampered with, you can >> use rpm to verify the package it came from. Well, I found this: >> >> >> rpm -Vv util-linux >> .... >> ........ /usr/bin/cal >> S.?..... /usr/bin/chfn >> ........ /usr/bin/chrt >> S.?..... /usr/bin/chsh > > I didn't see this on a clean install, but.. > > S means size differs from rpmdb entry, ? means the md5sum test could not be > done. I'm guessing interference from prelink. If you can, turn it off(*) and > re-run the test. > > (*) change to "PRELINKING=no" in /etc/sysconfig/prelink and > run /etc/cron.daily/prelink. > > /Peter Thanks, Peter! I don't understand why prelink would affect the rpm database, but turning prelink off and then back on cleared those flags. Yes, mine was an upgrade from 5.3. -- Without music, life would be a mistake. --Friedrich Nietzsche _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Sun Dec 20 10:30:02 2009 Return-path: <bounce-debian-devel=tom=linux-archive.org@lists.debian.org> Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org Delivery-date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:52:57 +0200 Received: from liszt.debian.org ([82.195.75.100]:43141) by s2.java-tips.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bounce-debian-devel=tom=linux-archive.org@lists.debian.org>) id 1NMGb3-0005TU-0V for tom@linux-archive.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:52:57 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP id E1FF413A67E4; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Old-Return-Path: <debbugs@rietz.debian.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on liszt.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=LDO_WHITELIST, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 X-Original-To: lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org Delivered-To: lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D85E13A67DF for <lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:01:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] autolearn=ham Received: from liszt.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with ESMTP id U2QG3uM3T5S2 for <lists-debian-devel@liszt.debian.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rietz.debian.org (rietz.debian.org [140.211.166.43]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3B113A67C9; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>) id 1NMGf3-0004NU-Di; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:57:05 +0000 X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#561773: ITP: islamic-menus -- Islamic menu categories for applications under GNOME and KDE Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D8=A3=D8=AD=D9=85=D8=AF_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D8=A7=D9=84=D9=85=D8=AD=D9=85=D9=88=D8=AF=D9= 8A?= <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net>, 561773@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D8=A3=D8=AD=D9=85=D8=AF_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D8=A7=D9=84=D9=85=D8=AD=D9=85=D9=88=D8=AF=D9= 8A?= <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net> Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, <wnpp@debian.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?"=D8=A3=D8=AD=D9=85=D8=AF_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D8=A7=D9=84=D9=85=D8=AD=D9=85=D9=88=D8=AF=D9= 8A"?= <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net> X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.561773.B.126129541914613@bugs.debian.or g> X-Debian-PR-Message: report 561773 X-Debian-PR-Package: wnpp X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@bugs.debian.org id=B.126129541914613 (code B ref -1); Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:57:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2009 07:50:19 +0000 Received: from out.tedata.net.eg ([212.103.160.61]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net>) id 1NMGYU-0003jv-U7 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:50:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 23586 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2009 07:50:11 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 23417, pid: 23419, t: 7.5097s scanners: regex: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.94.2/m:51/d:9767 spam: 3.2.3 Received: from host-41.232.110.157.tedata.net (HELO ants) (nehadmohamed@[41.232.110.157]) (envelope-sender <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net>) by out.tedata.net.eg (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; 20 Dec 2009 07:50:03 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ants [127.0.0.1]) by ants (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA064041B; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:50:03 +0200 (EET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D8=A3=D8=AD=D9=85=D8=AF_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D8=A7=D9=84=D9=85=D8=AD=D9=85=D9=88=D8=AF=D9= 8A?= <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Message-ID: <20091220075002.30453.28609.reportbug@localhost.lo caldomain> X-Mailer: reportbug 4.7ubuntu1 Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:50:02 +0200 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:57:05 +0000 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01 X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/258059 X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org List-Id: <debian-devel.lists.debian.org> List-Post: <mailto:debian-devel@lists.debian.org> List-Help: <mailto:debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "=D8=A3=D8=AD=D9=85=D8=AF =D8=A7=D9=84=D9=85=D8=AD=D9=85=D9=88=D8=AF= =D9=8A" <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net> * Package name : islamic-menus Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : =D8=A3=D8=AD=D9=85=D8=AF =D8=A7=D9=84=D9=85=D8=AD=D9=85= =D9=88=D8=AF=D9=8A <aelmahmoudy@users.sourceforge.net> * URL : https://launchpad.net/islamic-menu * License : GPL3+, CC-BY-SA Programming Lang: N/A Description : Islamic menu categories for applications under GNOME = and KDE This package installs desktop menus for grouping Islamic applications on GNOME, KDE and other XDG menu-spec compliant desktop environments. --=20 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian= .org |
unverified files in 5.4
On Sunday 20 December 2009, ken wrote:
> On 12/18/2009 10:53 AM Peter Kjellstrom wrote: > > On Friday 18 December 2009, ken wrote: ... > >> To ensure that a file hasn't been corrupted or tampered with, you can > >> use rpm to verify the package it came from. Well, I found this: > >> > >> rpm -Vv util-linux > >> .... > >> ........ /usr/bin/cal > >> S.?..... /usr/bin/chfn ... > > S means size differs from rpmdb entry, ? means the md5sum test could not > > be done. I'm guessing interference from prelink. If you can, turn it > > off(*) and re-run the test. ... > Thanks, Peter! I don't understand why prelink would affect the rpm > database, I'm quite sure that the database only stores the original "un-prelinked" checksum and the it's up to the -V command to compensate if it finds a prelinked binary (which apparently doesn't always work...). > but turning prelink off and then back on cleared those flags. Great :-) /Peter > Yes, mine was an upgrade from 5.3. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.