FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > CentOS > CentOS

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 12-14-2009, 08:59 AM
Rainer Traut
 
Default C5 updates?

Hi,

is there some congestion with C5 updates?
Upstream has released some security and bugfix updates so far...

Thx
Rainer

PS: i guess as soon as this mail arrives at the list, the updates start
flowing.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-14-2009, 10:12 AM
Karanbir Singh
 
Default C5 updates?

On 12/14/2009 09:59 AM, Rainer Traut wrote:
> is there some congestion with C5 updates?

yes there is.

> Upstream has released some security and bugfix updates so far...

yes, and they seem to have - yet again - changed some major packages in
the buildroots for EL5. I now need to figure out ( and am doing ) what
and how that changes things for us here.

> PS: i guess as soon as this mail arrives at the list, the updates start
> flowing.

nope - updates will only start flowing once the issues are resolved -
given the way things are looking right now, I'd expect that to be
sometime tomorrow evening.

--
Karanbir Singh
London, UK | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-14-2009, 10:42 AM
"Sorin Srbu"
 
Default C5 updates?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Karanbir Singh
>Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 12:12 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] C5 updates?
>
>yes, and they seem to have - yet again - changed some major packages in
>the buildroots for EL5. I now need to figure out ( and am doing ) what
>and how that changes things for us here.

Upstream didn't do this to spite us, and others building off of the Upstream
sources, did they?
--
/Sorin (Paranoics'R'Us)
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-14-2009, 10:45 AM
Karanbir Singh
 
Default C5 updates?

On 12/14/2009 11:42 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> Upstream didn't do this to spite us, and others building off of the Upstream
> sources, did they?

I doubt it they are all really nice people ( the ones I know and have
met anyway )!

--
Karanbir Singh
London, UK | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-14-2009, 11:08 AM
"Sorin Srbu"
 
Default C5 updates?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Karanbir Singh
>Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 12:46 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] C5 updates?
>
>On 12/14/2009 11:42 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> Upstream didn't do this to spite us, and others building off of the
>> Upstream
>> sources, did they?
>
>I doubt it they are all really nice people ( the ones I know and have
>met anyway )!

Altights, good enough for me!

Thanks for doing such a good job with CentOS for us [the thanks includes any
Upstreamers lurking on this list as well. ;-)]
--
/Sorin
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-14-2009, 11:09 AM
Rainer Traut
 
Default C5 updates?

Am 14.12.2009 12:12, schrieb Karanbir Singh:
> On 12/14/2009 09:59 AM, Rainer Traut wrote:

>> Upstream has released some security and bugfix updates so far...
>
> yes, and they seem to have - yet again - changed some major packages in
> the buildroots for EL5. I now need to figure out ( and am doing ) what
> and how that changes things for us here.

Thx for the info. I'll keep my fingers crossed for you.

Rainer

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-16-2009, 08:33 PM
Karanbir Singh
 
Default C5 updates?

On 12/14/2009 11:12 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> nope - updates will only start flowing once the issues are resolved -
> given the way things are looking right now, I'd expect that to be
> sometime tomorrow evening.
>

all pending c5 updates are now syncing to the mirrors, wait for the
announcements soon !

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-16-2009, 08:36 PM
Peter Serwe
 
Default C5 updates?

Do any of them happen to include a fix for ldap?*

Peter

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@karan.org> wrote:

On 12/14/2009 11:12 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:

> nope - updates will only start flowing once the issues are resolved -

> given the way things are looking right now, I'd expect that to be

> sometime tomorrow evening.

>



all pending c5 updates are now syncing to the mirrors, wait for the

announcements soon !



- KB

_______________________________________________

CentOS mailing list

CentOS@centos.org

http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



--
Peter Serwe
http://truthlightway.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-17-2009, 03:27 PM
Phil Schaffner
 
Default C5 updates?

Karanbir Singh wrote on 12/16/2009 04:33 PM:
...
> all pending c5 updates are now syncing to the mirrors, wait for the
> announcements soon !

As the updates include glibc and kernel, it it correct that the best
practice for updating would be as follows?

yum clean all
yum update glibc*
yum update
shutdown -r now

Phil

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-17-2009, 04:00 PM
Gilbert Sebenste
 
Default C5 updates?

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Phil Schaffner wrote:

> Karanbir Singh wrote on 12/16/2009 04:33 PM:
> ...
>> all pending c5 updates are now syncing to the mirrors, wait for the
>> announcements soon !
>
> As the updates include glibc and kernel, it it correct that the best
> practice for updating would be as follows?
>
> yum clean all
> yum update glibc*
> yum update
> shutdown -r now

Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but that should be for version
updates. So far, I have had no problems doing the updates available,
including glibc. But, I still see a number of them are missing; the NTP
DOS most notably, so I hope there's just a momentary glitch before the
floodgates open again.

************************************************** *****************************
Gilbert Sebenste ********
(My opinions only!) ******
Staff Meteorologist, Northern Illinois University ****
E-mail: sebenste@weather.admin.niu.edu ***
web: http://weather.admin.niu.edu **
************************************************** *****************************
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:38 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org