FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > CentOS > CentOS

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 11-24-2009, 08:07 AM
Wahyu Darmawan
 
Default Network CentOS 2.1

Hi All,
I have 2 LAN interfaces, and just added a new one, but it wouldn't configure.
when I finished configure and I run command ifup eth2 appeared error message :

netmask: Host name lookup failure

Need your help soon.

Thanks,
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 11-24-2009, 10:02 AM
Kai Schaetzl
 
Default Network CentOS 2.1

Wahyu Darmawan wrote on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:07:34 +0700:

> Need your help soon.

And it doesn't come to your mind you have to provide details first?

Kai

--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 11-24-2009, 10:12 AM
Wahyu Darmawan
 
Default Network CentOS 2.1

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists@conactive.com> wrote:
> Wahyu Darmawan wrote on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:07:34 +0700:
>
>> Need your help soon.
>
> And it doesn't come to your mind you have to provide details first?
>
> Kai
>
> --
> Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Thanks Kai..
I've server HP DL580G2, and installed 2 lan cards on it (eth0 and
eth1). And, I just added new one of lan card (eth2).
eth0 using intel chipset
eth1 and eth2 using broadcom
when i configured ip on eth2, and then I ran command 'ifup eth2'
appeared error message:
netmask: Host name lookup failure

And, eth1 couldn't ping by outside suddenly (firewall status is off).

Does anybody can help me? What should I do to make them work?
Many thanks before.


Rgds,
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 11-24-2009, 12:31 PM
Kai Schaetzl
 
Default Network CentOS 2.1

Wahyu Darmawan wrote on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:12:43 +0700:

> when i configured ip on eth2,

why don't you simply tell exactly what you did? It should be *very*
obvious to you that there is something wrong with the data (netmask?) you
entered or with the way you did it. Continued telling that you "configured
ip on eth2" is not better than telling what you had for breakfast today.

*Provide complete information*

Have you even considered using Google?
http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&num=30&q=%22netmask%
3A+Host+name+lookup+failure%22&meta=&aq=f&oq=

And, is that *really* CentOS 2.1?

Kai

--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 11-24-2009, 12:49 PM
Les Mikesell
 
Default Network CentOS 2.1

Wahyu Darmawan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists@conactive.com> wrote:
>> Wahyu Darmawan wrote on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:07:34 +0700:
>>
>>> Need your help soon.
>> And it doesn't come to your mind you have to provide details first?
>>
>> Kai
>>
>> --
>> Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
>> Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
>
> Thanks Kai..
> I've server HP DL580G2, and installed 2 lan cards on it (eth0 and
> eth1). And, I just added new one of lan card (eth2).
> eth0 using intel chipset
> eth1 and eth2 using broadcom
> when i configured ip on eth2, and then I ran command 'ifup eth2'
> appeared error message:
> netmask: Host name lookup failure
>
> And, eth1 couldn't ping by outside suddenly (firewall status is off).
>
> Does anybody can help me? What should I do to make them work?
> Many thanks before.

If you had previously configured the other NICs and have now moved the
connections, be sure that you have removed the IP address and GATEWAY settings
from the original ones - you may still be trying to route through them.
"ifconfig" and "route -n" should show which interfaces the system thinks are active.

--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Tue Nov 24 15:30:01 2009
Return-path: <fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:29:32 +0200
Received: from hormel1.redhat.com ([209.132.177.33]:50152 helo=hormel.redhat.com)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com>)
id 1NCvSW-0001pT-Sc
for tom@linux-archive.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:29:32 +0200
Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.110])
by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBA7618EE5;
Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:53:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
(nat-pool.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.5.200])
by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
nAODrGeE020156 for <fedora-list@listman.util.phx.redhat.com>;
Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:53:16 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
[10.5.110.6])
by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP
id nAODrGHN024580
for <fedora-list@redhat.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:53:16 -0500
Received: from mars.math-info.univ-paris5.fr (mars.math-info.univ-paris5.fr
[193.48.200.18])
by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAODr500008646
for <fedora-list@redhat.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:53:06 -0500
Received: from dipankar.homelinux.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mars.math-info.univ-paris5.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id
nAODr3gO018728
for <fedora-list@redhat.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:53:04 +0100
Message-ID: <4B0BE53F.8080200@mi.parisdescartes.fr>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:53:03 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?RnJhbsOnb2lzIFBhdHRl? <francois.patte@mi.parisdescartes.fr>
Organization: =?UTF-8?B?VW5pdmVyc2l0w6kgUGFyaXMgRGVzY2FydGVz?User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Community assistance, encouragement,
and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@redhat.com>
References: <4B0BBB7B.9080000@mi.parisdescartes.fr>
<124299980911240327l12a751e6q79c78597e7955ea9@mail .gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <124299980911240327l12a751e6q79c78597e7955ea9@mail .gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -0.667 (AWL)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.18
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.110.6
X-loop: fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: install libgcc without yum rpm etc.
X-BeenThere: fedora-list@redhat.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: "Community assistance, encouragement,
and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@redhat.com>
List-Id: "Community assistance, encouragement,
and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,
<mailto:fedora-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:fedora-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,
<mailto:fedora-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le 24/11/2009 12:27, Ian Malone a écrit :
> 2009/11/24 François Patte <francois.patte@mi.parisdescartes.fr>:
>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> I made a mistake and erased libgcc....
>>
>> How can I re-install it without using yum or rpm which seem to depend on
>> this library...
>>
>> Thanks for helping
>>
>>
>
> Not sure if this will work, but maybe boot from a live or rescue mode
> CD for the same architecture/release version and copy libgcc_s.so*
> over from /usr/lib or /usr/lib64 as appropriate, then reboot and do a
> yum install/reinstall/update on the package?

OK thanks. It works. Instead of rescue mode, I get the file from another
install.

- --
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksL5T8ACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXSHACglK/bk3fTk4Sg7mHBh3T5pUso
EAwAn2IJ5Smhf0J1jJLwTkmolYlOC9g0
=HmnR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:12 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org