I tried removing the /var/lib/rpm/__* and rebuild, but no help. Still
have two instances of the key. Any way to clean that without a remove and
reinstall of all the keys?
Anyway, a search of the archives has an entry indicating that gnucash
was available for CentOS 4.x, but nada about 5. Am I too early on this?
Anyhoo, figuring that docs could be addressed later, I then foolishly
(need more coffee?) did
Error: Missing Dependency: gnucash-docs >= 2.2.0 is needed by package
gnucash-2.2.4-1.el5.kb.i386 (kbs-CentOS-Testing)
Undaunted, I figured to download via yum and force installation with
nodeps (hmm, yum --downloadonly didn't work. Nothing in the docs about
that though. Did
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd
The docs were installed though AFAICT. ISTR seeing stuff similar to this
with other packages in the dim past. Don't recall any solutions though.
I wonder if there's a way to suppress that activity. I don't
particularly care for packages that require on-line references for local
and potentially sensitive work. I'm thinking there might be a
configuration file I could modify because I see some similar files
already on the system. I'll pursue that later if I get gnucash
installed.
Package gwenhywfar-2.6.2-2.el5.kb.i386.rpm is not signed
At that point I felt maybe I was a bit premature as I had already
confirmed that I had the gpg key installed.
Any words of wisdom for me? If I don't need to worry about the signing
issues, I guess I could download and install all with --nodeps. Good/bad
idea? Anything I might do to help the process along? I've not done any
rpm work, so it might take awhile if there is anything too technical.
I'm going to fire up my 4.x and see if it works there. I can muddle
through there, with a small amount of inconvenience. But that might be
worth it.
Before I forget, thanks to you and all the crew for the hard work that
benefits us all.
TIA
--
Bill
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
11-22-2008, 07:17 PM
R P Herrold
kbs-CentOS-Testing gnucash: status for CentOS 5?
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, William L. Maltby wrote:
I figured I had forgot to install the gpg key, so I did that. Well, now
I have to instances of that key. When I try to remove one copy,
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
11-22-2008, 09:23 PM
"William L. Maltby"
kbs-CentOS-Testing gnucash: status for CentOS 5?
On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 15:17 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> > I figured I had forgot to install the gpg key, so I did that. Well, now
> > I have to instances of that key. When I try to remove one copy,
> >
> > # rpm -e gpg-pubkey-3e13cf5b-422eea1c
> > error: "gpg-pubkey-3e13cf5b-422eea1c" specifies multiple packages
>
> add the --allmatches option to the rpm -e
Thanks! In the rpm man page I had searched for "ignore" and "error" and
a few other things I could think of to try and get around it. <*sigh*> I
guess someday I'll have to actually read the _whole_thing_ so that my
(used-to-be?) excellent memory for the generalities can save me.
>
> and it will work as you wish to elide that key
>
> -- Russ herrold
> <snip sig stuff>
BTW, in case KB is looking, the install on 4.x went just fine and I'm
now reading the tutorial (the _whole_thing_ 8=O )
Thanks again, Russ
--
Bill
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
kbs-CentOS-Testing gnucash: status for CentOS 5?
