Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ???

JC
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

junior.listas wrote:

Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ???

JC


Yes .. i had to build it for my Asus Eee PC 900 , but the wiki already
knew it : http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Asus/Eeepc


Don't forget that i've built the kmod for the stock 5.2 kernel but it
survives a kernel update (thanks to the `weak-updates` philosophy on el5)
If you already have a newer kernel on your box, let me know and i'll
build a specific version if needed


--
-
Fabian Arrotin <fabian.arrotin@arrfab.net>
"Internet network currently down, TCP/IP packets delivered now by
UPS/Fedex ..."




_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:07 PM, junior.listas <junior.listas@gmail.com> wrote:

Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ???



JC

_______________________________________________

CentOS mailing list

CentOS@centos.org

http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Not exactly your question, but I managed to make it work thanks to http://repo.redhat-club.org/redhat/5/SRPMS/
HTH
--

Eduardo Grosclaude
Universidad Nacional del Comahue
Neuquen, Argentina

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Sorry, may i be wrong, but

I was compiled this module for other distro, with kernel 2.6.18, from
http://people.redhat.com/csnook/atl2/, the the version is 2.0.5, Wy we
use 1.0 version?? There is some note for why the module ( 2.0 ) does not
compile under centos??


thanks for your attention...

JC



Eduardo Grosclaude escreveu:



On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:07 PM, junior.listas
<junior.listas@gmail.com <mailto:junior.listas@gmail.com>> wrote:


Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ???

JC
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org <mailto:CentOS@centos.org>
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Not exactly your question, but I managed to make it work thanks to
http://repo.redhat-club.org/redhat/5/SRPMS/

HTH

--
Eduardo Grosclaude
Universidad Nacional del Comahue
Neuquen, Argentina
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:29 AM, junior.listas <junior.listas@gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry, may i be wrong, *but



I was compiled this module for other distro, with kernel 2.6.18, from http://people.redhat.com/csnook/atl2/, the the version is 2.0.5, Wy we use 1.0 version?? There is some note for why the module ( 2.0 ) does not compile under centos??




thanks for your attention...

I was unable to compile the module provided with the board (nor the kernel itself, by the way) under any CentOS 5 kernel choice. However, the repo I pointed to worked flawlessly for me. The binary RPMs are OK too.

Did not know about the link you mentioned.



--
Eduardo Grosclaude
Universidad Nacional del Comahue
Neuquen, Argentina

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

The link is the same that come with the board, but new versions.....

I just can't understand why this modules compiles ok with any kernel,
except centos kernel...


JC





Eduardo Grosclaude escreveu:



On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:29 AM, junior.listas
<junior.listas@gmail.com <mailto:junior.listas@gmail.com>> wrote:


Sorry, may i be wrong, but

I was compiled this module for other distro, with kernel 2.6.18,
from http://people.redhat.com/csnook/atl2/, the the version is
2.0.5, Wy we use 1.0 version?? There is some note for why the
module ( 2.0 ) does not compile under centos??

thanks for your attention...

I was unable to compile the module provided with the board (nor the
kernel itself, by the way) under any CentOS 5 kernel choice. However,
the repo I pointed to worked flawlessly for me. The binary RPMs are OK
too.

Did not know about the link you mentioned.




--
Eduardo Grosclaude
Universidad Nacional del Comahue
Neuquen, Argentina
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos