updated Apache mod_expires?
 

I noticed that the apache rpm httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3.src.rpm
has a bug in mod_expires.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39774


Please forgive a dumb question: how risky would using a Fedora httpd RPM
be on a CentOS5 install?



Jed
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

updated Apache mod_expires?
 

Jed Reynolds wrote:

I noticed that the apache rpm httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3.src.rpm
has a bug in mod_expires.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39774


Please forgive a dumb question: how risky would using a Fedora httpd
RPM be on a CentOS5 install?



it probably flat out wouldn't work, as its linked against different
version libraries.


and, remember, your apache rpm is quite closely bound to all the apache
extensions, like mod_php etc etc.



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

updated Apache mod_expires?
 

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Jed Reynolds <lists@bitratchet.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the apache rpm httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3.src.rpm
> has a bug in mod_expires.
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39774
>
> Please forgive a dumb question: how risky would using a Fedora httpd RPM be
> on a CentOS5 install?


What I'd recommend would be to file a bug upstream at
bugzilla.redhat.com (if one doesn't already exist). That way others
who might run into this bug can get the benefit as well. It may also
result in a quick test package produced so that you can see if the
issue gets fixed.


--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos