FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > CentOS > CentOS

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 12-11-2007, 09:32 PM
"Gregory P. Ennis"
 
Default vsifax on Centos 5.1

All....

I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.

At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
the same error.

One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.

./eula: cannot execute binary file

The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.

I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.

Thanks much!!!

Greg Ennis

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-11-2007, 10:32 PM
Liam Kirsher
 
Default vsifax on Centos 5.1

Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.

Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> All....
>
> I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
> staff have been helpful but no cigar.
>
> At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
> so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
> the same error.
>
> One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
> eula which fails.
>
> ./eula: cannot execute binary file
>
> The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
> Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
>
> I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
> listening to this list and could give me a hand.
>
> Thanks much!!!
>
> Greg Ennis
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
>

--
Liam Kirsher
PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-11-2007, 10:56 PM
"Vincent Knecht"
 
Default vsifax on Centos 5.1

> All....
>
> I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
> staff have been helpful but no cigar.
>
> At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
> so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
> the same error.
>
> One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
> eula which fails.
>
> ./eula: cannot execute binary file

maybe just retry after invoking that command ?
chmod +x eula

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-12-2007, 01:21 AM
"Gregory P. Ennis"
 
Default vsifax on Centos 5.1

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 00:56 +0100, Vincent Knecht wrote:
> > All....
> >
> > I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
> > staff have been helpful but no cigar.
> >
> > At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
> > so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
> > the same error.
> >
> > One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
> > eula which fails.
> >
> > ./eula: cannot execute binary file
>
> maybe just retry after invoking that command ?
> chmod +x eula
>

Thanks for the suggestion. I probably should have posted the deails.
I was actually hoping that the protections was the issue but looks to me
that it is not

Greg

-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-12-2007, 01:29 AM
"Gregory P. Ennis"
 
Default vsifax on Centos 5.1

On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
> Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
> If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
> see what it's doing?
> Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
> executable, which should be easy to fix.
>
> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > All....
> >
> > I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
> > staff have been helpful but no cigar.
> >
> > At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
> > so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
> > the same error.
> >
> > One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
> > eula which fails.
> >
> > ./eula: cannot execute binary file
> >
> > The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
> > Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
> >
> > I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
> > listening to this list and could give me a hand.
> >
> > Thanks much!!!
> >
> > Greg Ennis
> >
> > _______________________________________________

The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :

[root@MailIn install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file

The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula

The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
^A^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^B^@ ^@f<98>^@^@^@^D
^@i^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j
^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^ @^A(^@^B^@^@^A(^@^C<94>^@^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^B ^@^C^P^@^@^@^@^G^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m ^@m^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@ <80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|+x|^^^@<91>^@^@<91>^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B ^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83 >^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>^@89^@^@^@}sx} {x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>^@^,^G^@^@A< 82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B,^ C^@^@<94>!<90>^A^@HA<82>^@<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^ C<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8! ^@@}<88>^CN<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81>< 82>^@4<90>A^@^T


Thanks for your help!!

Greg
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-12-2007, 01:47 AM
Clint Dilks
 
Default vsifax on Centos 5.1

Gregory P. Ennis wrote:

On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:


Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.

Gregory P. Ennis wrote:


All....

I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.

At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
the same error.

One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.


./eula: cannot execute binary file

The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.


I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.

Thanks much!!!

Greg Ennis

_______________________________________________



The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :

[root@MailIn install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file

The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula

The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
^A^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^B^@ ^@f<98>^@^@^@^D
^@i^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j
^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^ @^A(^@^B^@^@^A(^@^C<94>^@^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^B ^@^C^P^@^@^@^@^G^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m ^@m^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@ <80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|+x|^^^@<91>^@^@<91>^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B ^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83 >^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>^@89^@^@^@}sx} {x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>^@^,^G^@^@A< 82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B,^ C^@^@<94>!<90>^A^@HA<82>^@<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^ C<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8! ^@@}<88>^CN<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81>< 82>^@4<90>A^@^T


Thanks for your help!!

Greg
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



Hi,
What information is returned when you type file eula ?


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-12-2007, 01:52 AM
"Gregory P. Ennis"
 
Default vsifax on Centos 5.1

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
> >
> >> Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
> >> If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
> >> see what it's doing?
> >> Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
> >> executable, which should be easy to fix.
> >>
> >> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> >>
> >>> All....
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
> >>> staff have been helpful but no cigar.
> >>>
> >>> At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
> >>> so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
> >>> the same error.
> >>>
> >>> One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
> >>> eula which fails.
> >>>
> >>> ./eula: cannot execute binary file
> >>>
> >>> The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
> >>> Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
> >>>
> >>> I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
> >>> listening to this list and could give me a hand.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks much!!!
> >>>
> >>> Greg Ennis
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>>
> >
> > The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
> > installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
> > looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
> > like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
> > received the same error :
> >
> > [root@MailIn install]# ./eula
> > -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
> >
> > The file is executable :
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
> >
> > The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
> > ^A^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^B^@ ^@f<98>^@^@^@^D
> > ^@i^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j
> > ^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^ @^A(^@^B^@^@^A(^@^C<94>^@^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^B ^@^C^P^@^@^@^@^G^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m ^@m^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@ <80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|+x|^^^@<91>^@^@<91>^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B ^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83 >^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>^@89^@^@^@}sx} {x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>^@^,^G^@^@A< 82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B,^ C^@^@<94>!<90>^A^@HA<82>^@<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^ C<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8! ^@@}<88>^CN<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81>< 82>^@4<90>A^@^T
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your help!!
> >
> > Greg
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> >
> Hi,
> What information is returned when you type file eula ?
>
>

typing in ./eula returns
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file

I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the
results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system
different than EL5 Linux.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-12-2007, 02:12 AM
Clint Dilks
 
Default vsifax on Centos 5.1

Gregory P. Ennis wrote:

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:


Gregory P. Ennis wrote:


On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:



Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.

Gregory P. Ennis wrote:



All....

I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.

At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
the same error.

One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.


./eula: cannot execute binary file

The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.


I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.

Thanks much!!!

Greg Ennis

_______________________________________________



The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :

[root@MailIn install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file

The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula

The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
^A^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^B^@ ^@f<98>^@^@^@^D
^@i^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j
^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^ @^A(^@^B^@^@^A(^@^C<94>^@^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^B ^@^C^P^@^@^@^@^G^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m ^@m^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@ <80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|+x|^^^@<91>^@^@<91>^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B ^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83 >^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>^@89^@^@^@}sx} {x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>^@^,^G^@^@A< 82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B,^ C^@^@<94>!<90>^A^@HA<82>^@<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^ C<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8! ^@@}<88>^CN<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81>< 82>^@4<90>A^@^T


Thanks for your help!!

Greg
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




Hi,
What information is returned when you type file eula ?





typing in ./eula returns
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file

I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the
results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system
different than EL5 Linux.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on
one of my systems if I type


file /usr/bin/pstree

/usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1
(SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-12-2007, 02:24 AM
"Gregory P. Ennis"
 
Default vsifax on Centos 5.1

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
> >
> >> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
> >>>> If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
> >>>> see what it's doing?
> >>>> Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
> >>>> executable, which should be easy to fix.
> >>>>
> >>>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> All....
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
> >>>>> staff have been helpful but no cigar.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
> >>>>> so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
> >>>>> the same error.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
> >>>>> eula which fails.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ./eula: cannot execute binary file
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
> >>>>> Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
> >>>>> listening to this list and could give me a hand.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks much!!!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Greg Ennis
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>> The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
> >>> installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
> >>> looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
> >>> like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
> >>> received the same error :
> >>>
> >>> [root@MailIn install]# ./eula
> >>> -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
> >>>
> >>> The file is executable :
> >>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
> >>>
> >>> The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
> >>> ^A^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^B^@ ^@f<98>^@^@^@^D
> >>> ^@i^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j
> >>> ^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^ @^A(^@^B^@^@^A(^@^C<94>^@^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^B ^@^C^P^@^@^@^@^G^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m ^@m^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@ <80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|+x|^^^@<91>^@^@<91>^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B ^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83 >^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>^@89^@^@^@}sx} {x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>^@^,^G^@^@A< 82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B,^ C^@^@<94>!<90>^A^@HA<82>^@<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^ C<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8! ^@@}<88>^CN<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81>< 82>^@4<90>A^@^T
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your help!!
> >>>
> >>> Greg
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> CentOS mailing list
> >>> CentOS@centos.org
> >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Hi,
> >> What information is returned when you type file eula ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > typing in ./eula returns
> > -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
> >
> > I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the
> > results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system
> > different than EL5 Linux.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> >
> Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on
> one of my systems if I type
>
> file /usr/bin/pstree
>
> /usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1
> (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
>
>

Clint,

Sorry... did . not understand your grammar thanks for the clarification

Here is the result.
eula: executable (RISC System/6000 V3.1) or obj module not stripped

Looks like to me that they gave me the wrong binaries. Do you agree?

Greg
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 12-12-2007, 02:36 AM
Clint Dilks
 
Default vsifax on Centos 5.1

Gregory P. Ennis wrote:

On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:


Gregory P. Ennis wrote:


On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:



Gregory P. Ennis wrote:



On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:




Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.

Gregory P. Ennis wrote:




All....

I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.

At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
the same error.

One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.


./eula: cannot execute binary file

The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.


I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.

Thanks much!!!

Greg Ennis

_______________________________________________




The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :

[root@MailIn install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file

The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula

The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
^A^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^B^@ ^@f<98>^@^@^@^D
^@i^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j
^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^ @^A(^@^B^@^@^A(^@^C<94>^@^@^@^@ ^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^B ^@^C^P^@^@^@^@^G^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m ^@m^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@ <80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^ @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|+x|^^^@<91>^@^@<91>^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B ^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83 >^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>^@89^@^@^@}sx} {x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>^@^,^G^@^@A< 82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B,^ C^@^@<94>!<90>^A^@HA<82>^@<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^ C<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^ @^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80> ^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^<80>^C^@^@<81> c^@^H|^H^C<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8! ^@@}<88>^CN<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81>< 82>^@4<90>A^@^T


Thanks for your help!!

Greg
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





Hi,
What information is returned when you type file eula ?





typing in ./eula returns
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file

I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the
results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system
different than EL5 Linux.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on
one of my systems if I type


file /usr/bin/pstree

/usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1
(SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped






Clint,

Sorry... did . not understand your grammar thanks for the clarification

Here is the result.
eula: executable (RISC System/6000 V3.1) or obj module not stripped

Looks like to me that they gave me the wrong binaries. Do you agree?

Greg
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



Hi, Definitely.

I can't tell you off hand what system its compiler for but most likely
AIX or PowerPC.


Tkae Care

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:20 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org