Proposed New Mailing List
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> And yea, working on setting up a sort of list to handle > much of this semi OT traffic. More news on that around > Wed next week, dint ask about it now. Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long as a topic is marked OT, it is preferable to one not marked but one in which the OP has not even done basic research on his problem. One distro had a "brainflash" a number of years ago - create a list for expert users and one for newbies. It didn't take long for the newbies to realise that there was no one to help and so flooded the "expert list". This put off the "experts". On some mailing lists, long time users are put off by the flood of posts by newbies who don't even conform to the list guidelines. Some pay back by not replying to those in violation without as much as a hint. Would a new list really solve anything or would it close one door and open another? Regards, Vandaman. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Proposed New Mailing List
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Vandaman <vandaman2002-rt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> And yea, working on setting up a sort of list to handle >> much of this semi OT traffic. More news on that around >> Wed next week, dint ask about it now. > > Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long > as a topic is marked OT, it is preferable to one not marked > but one in which the OP has not even done basic research > on his problem. > > One distro had a "brainflash" a number of years ago - create > a list for expert users and one for newbies. It didn't take > long for the newbies to realise that there was no one to > help and so flooded the "expert list". This put off the > "experts". > > On some mailing lists, long time users are put off by the > flood of posts by newbies who don't even conform to the list > guidelines. Some pay back by not replying to those in violation > without as much as a hint. > > Would a new list really solve anything or would it close > one door and open another? A CentOS social list would allow the crumedgeon'ing to happen off the main list and for users looking for ISPs or other CentOS community recommended wares/services. I seriously doubt they would be talking newbie/expert lists, as I believe the whole purpose of the lists is to share your knowledge with the less knowledgable. If it were all experts there would be no traffic! -Ross _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Proposed New Mailing List
Vandaman wrote:
Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long as a topic is marked OT, it is preferable to one not marked but one in which the OP has not even done basic research on his problem. It may be preferable to YOU, but marking something OT doesn't stop it wasting MY bandwidth or clogging up MY inbox does it? Your latter point is a separate issue that has no relevance to this discussion. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Proposed New Mailing List
Ned Slider wrote:
> It may be preferable to YOU, but marking something > OT doesn't stop it wasting MY bandwidth or clogging > up MY inbox does it? > Your latter point is a separate issue that has no > relevance to this discussion. > If you cannot understand what is wrong with using the mailing list as your first port of call instead of a basic google search you may need brain surgery. It's not a waste of bandwidth to post ontopic stuff that is easily solved by simple google searches or reading the docs? Regards, Vandaman. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Proposed New Mailing List
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008, Ned Slider wrote:
> Vandaman wrote: >> >> Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long >> as a topic is marked OT, it is preferable to one not marked >> but one in which the OP has not even done basic research on his >> problem. >> > > It may be preferable to YOU, but marking something OT doesn't stop it > wasting MY bandwidth or clogging up MY inbox does it? That's what incoming mail filters are for :-). I must admit that I do the vast majority of my e-mail using mutt which makes it extremely easy for me to delete threads unread. This is usually much more time-consuming with GUI or web mail clients. Personally I have no problem with the occassional OT thread, and think that, within reason, they can make a list more ``friendly' and less intimidating to newbies. I also prefer more general lists to those that have very tight charters as I learn quite a bit when I see threads with interesting subjects that I might not see otherwise. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax: (206) 232-9186 Rights is a fictional abstraction. No one has ``Rights', neither machines nor flesh-and-blood. Persons... have opportunities, not rights, which they use or do not use. -- Lazarus Long _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Proposed New Mailing List
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 14:23 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
> <snip> > Personally I have no problem with the occassional OT thread, and > think that, within reason, they can make a list more ``friendly' > and less intimidating to newbies. Amen brother! > > I also prefer more general lists to those that have very tight > charters as I learn quite a bit when I see threads with > interesting subjects that I might not see otherwise. Hallelujah! > > Bill -- Bill (the other one - he's not talking to "hisself" ;-) _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Proposed New Mailing List
Vandaman wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> And yea, working on setting up a sort of list to handle >> much of this semi OT traffic. More news on that around >> Wed next week, dint ask about it now. > > Off course people are going to ask. your email is just a rant about nonsense and assumption. You have no idea as to what is going to be proposed not why and how. So I suggest you hang tight and wait for it. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Proposed New Mailing List
Vandaman wrote:
Ned Slider wrote: It may be preferable to YOU, but marking something OT doesn't stop it wasting MY bandwidth or clogging up MY inbox does it? Your latter point is a separate issue that has no relevance to this discussion. If you cannot understand what is wrong with using the mailing list as your first port of call instead of a basic google search you may need brain surgery. I understand very well thank you, but as I said above it has no relevance to the topic of an OFF TOPIC mailing list. I was referring to mails that have no place on the list in the first place! It's not a waste of bandwidth to post ontopic stuff that is easily solved by simple google searches or reading the docs? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Proposed New Mailing List
Bill Campbell wrote:
> Personally I have no problem with the occassional OT thread, and > think that, within reason, they can make a list more ``friendly' > and less intimidating to newbies. > I also prefer more general lists to those that have very tight > charters as I learn quite a bit when I see threads with > interesting subjects that I might not see otherwise. It will be interesting if things went like so :- - a CentOS Ivory Tower List for those on top of Ivory Towers. - a CentOS OT list full of 419 scammers, salesmen/affiliates posts - a CentOS n00b list for n00bs Regards, Vandaman. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Proposed New Mailing List
Vandaman wrote on Fri, 3 Oct 2008 21:15:36 +0000 (GMT):
> If you cannot understand what is wrong with using > the mailing list as your first port of call instead > of a basic google search you may need brain surgery. Can you please review your behavior and stop this now! Now! Thanks. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:50 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.