However, another post implies a possible oversight on my part. He
mentions entry # 5 in an announcement. Being an (a?)typical "hoomon", I
could've scrolled by too quickly and missed them. <*sigh*>. The ultimate
CPE problem.
Thinking about it, I tend too watch for the point releases in there own
announcements. Bad habit I guess.
Cheers,
Ralph
I don't even have any hits in my logs on that date, and I rechecked my filters.
I have Centos 4 in i686 and x86_64 and CentOS 5 in the same arches.
Maybe it only fell under the General CentOS 4 filter and didn't trickle out to
the individual arches.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
09-16-2008, 08:23 PM
Ralph Angenendt
i didn't see the 4.7 announcement
Scott Silva wrote:
> So I retract my "maybe it wasn't announced. But not my "I didn't get it".
>
> Nothing in my mail logs either except the announcement on Aug. 30 and the
> Announcements (8) on the 15th.
Which mail address? The one you use here didn't get any mails on sunday.
Ralph_____________________________________________ __
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
09-16-2008, 09:12 PM
Scott Silva
i didn't see the 4.7 announcement
on 9-16-2008 1:23 PM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
So I retract my "maybe it wasn't announced. But not my "I didn't get it".
Nothing in my mail logs either except the announcement on Aug. 30 and the
Announcements (8) on the 15th.
Which mail address? The one you use here didn't get any mails on sunday.
Ralph
I got 8 on Monday, and 2 on the 30th of August, and a few scattered before
that. I am just starting to think that having the filters down to 2 arches
just filtered the general announcement of the release.
No big deal, I saw the traffic from others after their upgrades, so
technically I got a 2nd hand announcement.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
09-16-2008, 09:24 PM
Ralph Angenendt
i didn't see the 4.7 announcement
Scott Silva wrote:
> I don't even have any hits in my logs on that date, and I rechecked my filters.
> I have Centos 4 in i686 and x86_64 and CentOS 5 in the same arches.
>
> Maybe it only fell under the General CentOS 4 filter and didn't trickle
> out to the individual arches.
That's exactly what I tried to say - no it does not fall under those filters.
But there is an option to turn that on (but I cannot find my password at the
moment).
Ralph
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
09-16-2008, 10:33 PM
Scott Silva
i didn't see the 4.7 announcement
on 9-16-2008 2:24 PM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
I don't even have any hits in my logs on that date, and I rechecked my filters.
I have Centos 4 in i686 and x86_64 and CentOS 5 in the same arches.
Maybe it only fell under the General CentOS 4 filter and didn't trickle
out to the individual arches.
That's exactly what I tried to say - no it does not fall under those filters.
But there is an option to turn that on (but I cannot find my password at the
moment).
Ralph
I have the following enabled (x) and proposed (p);
CentOS-3 i386 (Details)
CentOS-3 x86_64 (Details)
CentOS-3 ia64 (Details)
CentOS-3 s390 (Details)
CentOS-3 s390x (Details)
CentOS-3 (Details)
p CentOS-4 (Details)
x CentOS-4 i386 (Details)
CentOS-4 ia64 (Details)
x CentOS-4 x86_64 (Details)
CentOS-2 (Details)
CentOS-4 Alpha (Details)
p CentOS-5 (Details)
x CentOS-5 i386 (Details)
x CentOS-5 x86_64 (Details)
I'm hoping I get general announcements, but not everything in that version by
the (p)roposed settings.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
09-16-2008, 10:42 PM
Joe Pruett
i didn't see the 4.7 announcement
from looking at the regexs for the subscriptions, i can see that the
announcement would not be caught by any of the arch specific
subscriptions. so that explains why i (and probably others) didn't see
it. mystery solved.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
09-16-2008, 10:48 PM
Scott Silva
i didn't see the 4.7 announcement
on 9-16-2008 3:42 PM Joe Pruett spake the following:
from looking at the regexs for the subscriptions, i can see that the
announcement would not be caught by any of the arch specific
subscriptions. so that explains why i (and probably others) didn't see
it. mystery solved.
I also assume all blame for my loss.
I rectified my filter choices for next time.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
09-17-2008, 04:46 AM
Paul Norton
i didn't see the 4.7 announcement
Scott Silva wrote:
I don't even have any hits in my logs on that date, and I rechecked my
filters.
I have Centos 4 in i686 and x86_64 and CentOS 5 in the same arches.
Maybe it only fell under the General CentOS 4 filter and didn't trickle
out to the individual arches.
You're not alone.
I didn't receive the email either. I have also checked my
subscriptions, and CentOS 4 is one of them.
--
Paul Norton
Systems Administrator
Neoverve - www.neoverve.com
Neoverve Blog - http://blog.neoverve.com/
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
09-17-2008, 09:06 AM
Ralph Angenendt
i didn't see the 4.7 announcement
Paul Norton wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> I don't even have any hits in my logs on that date, and I rechecked my
>> filters.
>> I have Centos 4 in i686 and x86_64 and CentOS 5 in the same arches.
>>
>> Maybe it only fell under the General CentOS 4 filter and didn't trickle
>> out to the individual arches.
>
> You're not alone.
>
> I didn't receive the email either. I have also checked my
> subscriptions, and CentOS 4 is one of them.
Do you want to receive messages that do not match any topic filter?
Setting that to yes should get you those messages. Could be that the
"4.7" fell through the filter for CentOS 4.
Cheers,
Ralph
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
i didn't see the 4.7 announcement
