OT - Windows slowdown?
I know this isn't the right forum for this (do I ever!), but you-all know so much about everything I thought I'd ask.
About two months ago I resurrected my daughter's Compaq laptop (cracked screen - replaced it) and ran an update on it.* It's running Windows XP, SP1 (I think), but since the update it has run about 1/3 as fast as it used to. Does anyone know if there was a WXP update that killed performance on laptops?* None of my other XP installs, SP1 or SP2, suffers from this. (Actually, I should say "their other" 'cuz I don't use Windows unless I can't avoid it, and then I try to do it on my WXP VM where it's still relatively safe.) Thanks. mhr _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
OT - Windows slowdown?
My old IBM T21 suffered almost the same issues, tried to roll back the updates and even tried to install XP SP3 without any good performance change.
I had to reinstall Windows XP... I believe it's a waste of time trying to troubleshoot performance stuff under a multipatched old install windows if you just can reinstall and get a fresh registry. saludos. -- "It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion." "Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas" _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
OT - Windows slowdown?
Victor Padro wrote:
My old IBM T21 suffered almost the same issues, tried to roll back the updates and even tried to install XP SP3 without any good performance change. I had to reinstall Windows XP... I believe it's a waste of time trying to troubleshoot performance stuff under a multipatched old install windows if you just can reinstall and get a fresh registry. saludos. -- "It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion." "Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ This isn't the right place, but a bit of help is always welcome :) Windows XP, as with most other Windows' has the irritating habit of pilling up junk in the registry, and other places. My first check is always to check for viruses - update the virus definitions, and scan the PC thoroughly, do a scan disk & defrag, and then try a registry repair tool. Other than that, a re installation is your best bet. Good luck -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
OT - Windows slowdown?
Rudi Ahlers schrieb:
This isn't the right place, but a bit of help is always welcome :) Windows XP, as with most other Windows' has the irritating habit of pilling up junk in the registry, and other places. My first check is always to check for viruses - update the virus definitions, and scan the PC thoroughly, do a scan disk & defrag, and then try a registry repair tool. Other than that, a re installation is your best bet. Anything that takes longer than 30 minutes is better solved with a re-install (with Windows). Too bad that you have to re-install all the shiny applications, too (which takes ages, usually). But then, CentOS throws most of its stuff in /usr/bin and /bin, too, so you can't differentiate between "OS" and applications, either. I'd rather have a "base" install and a separate directory with "all the rest". And of course, two different RPM-dbs, too. cu, Rainer _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
OT - Windows slowdown?
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 02:03:26 MHR wrote:
> I know this isn't the right forum for this (do I ever!), but you-all know > so much about everything I thought I'd ask. > > About two months ago I resurrected my daughter's Compaq laptop (cracked > screen - replaced it) and ran an update on it. It's running Windows XP, > SP1 (I think), but since the update it has run about 1/3 as fast as it used > to. > > Does anyone know if there was a WXP update that killed performance on > laptops? None of my other XP installs, SP1 or SP2, suffers from this. > > (Actually, I should say "their other" 'cuz I don't use Windows unless I > can't avoid it, and then I try to do it on my WXP VM where it's still > relatively safe.) > Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the point of being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be lost, so I can't go back to before it. Anne _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
OT - Windows slowdown?
Anne Wilson wrote:
Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the point of being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be lost, so I can't go back to before it. I've installed SP3 on dozens of systems and seen no slowdowns. this is WAY off topic for this list. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
OT - Windows slowdown?
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Anne Wilson Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:11 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown? On Wednesday 16 July 2008 02:03:26 MHR wrote: > I know this isn't the right forum for this (do I ever!), but you-all > know so much about everything I thought I'd ask. > > About two months ago I resurrected my daughter's Compaq laptop > (cracked screen - replaced it) and ran an update on it. It's running > Windows XP, > SP1 (I think), but since the update it has run about 1/3 as fast as it > used to. > > Does anyone know if there was a WXP update that killed performance on > laptops? None of my other XP installs, SP1 or SP2, suffers from this. > > (Actually, I should say "their other" 'cuz I don't use Windows unless > I can't avoid it, and then I try to do it on my WXP VM where it's > still relatively safe.) > Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the point of being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be lost, so I can't go back to before it. Anne -------- Depending on how SP3 was installed you can Uninstall it. From Add Remove Programs. JohnStanley _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
OT - Windows slowdown?
> >
> Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the point > of > being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be lost, so I can't go back > to > before it. > > Anne Anne Sp3 doesn't kill performance if applied to a fresh install before any "other" updates or apps are applied / installed Installing sp3 on top of sp2 "just because" is realistically not a good thing... - rh _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
OT - Windows slowdown?
I've installed it on a half dozen machines here as part of a test. No issues
that I can see. All are XP Pro with SP2 and some IE6, some IE7. All upgraded to IE7 after, if they were IE6. I DID take images (Clonezilla!) of those machines before I installed........ Just a habit I got into years ago. (Taking images before major changes, not Clonezilla. I used to use Imagecast...) Dennis > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces@centos.org > [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert - elists > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 7:59 AM > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: RE: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown? > > > > > > > Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the > > point of being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be > lost, so I > > can't go back to before it. > > > > Anne > > Anne > > Sp3 doesn't kill performance if applied to a fresh install > before any "other" updates or apps are applied / installed > > Installing sp3 on top of sp2 "just because" is realistically > not a good thing... > > - rh > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
OT - Windows slowdown?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Rainer Duffner wrote: | But then, CentOS throws most of its stuff in /usr/bin and /bin, too, so | you can't differentiate between "OS" and applications, either. | | I'd rather have a "base" install and a separate directory with "all the | rest". And of course, two different RPM-dbs, too. | That's what rpm is for. - -- Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.) milton@calnek.com 306-717-8737 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIfhHhHgnbf2T2QqMRAhkVAJ4j5b3fhfjdvIDNhQBATS/S4BtQHQCgjPDN XqolbHg7uIMUtaZh74uj7oA= =z7o1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:18 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.