Excluded files from repos?
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Sam Drinkard wrote: Ok.. I'm way behind the 8-ball on setting things up correctly, but after going over the protection things in yum, I ran a yum check-update and it returned with having 318 files excluded because of protection. Is that too high a number? I have the numerical protection set to 1. Is there a good tutorial about how to correctly set up the protect base. I'd go with the priorities plugin. Everything about Repositories, Protectbase, Priorities and more at: <http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/> Cheers, Ralph Just to be on the safe side, I installed both plugins and have them configured now. FWIW, I did a yum check-update and for some unknown reason, I got no dependency issues and nothing was tagged for update! Surely the addition of the protectbase and priorities plugins didn't do that??? I appreciate all you all have responded, and apologize for the lame questions. Time for me to do some more list reading I suppose. Sam _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Excluded files from repos?
on 6-10-2008 12:35 PM Sam Drinkard spake the following:
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Sam Drinkard wrote: Ok.. I'm way behind the 8-ball on setting things up correctly, but after going over the protection things in yum, I ran a yum check-update and it returned with having 318 files excluded because of protection. Is that too high a number? I have the numerical protection set to 1. Is there a good tutorial about how to correctly set up the protect base. I'd go with the priorities plugin. Everything about Repositories, Protectbase, Priorities and more at: <http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/> Cheers, Ralph Just to be on the safe side, I installed both plugins and have them configured now. FWIW, I did a yum check-update and for some unknown reason, I got no dependency issues and nothing was tagged for update! Surely the addition of the protectbase and priorities plugins didn't do that??? It could have, and please don't call me Shirley! ;-P (I know, old joke!) I appreciate all you all have responded, and apologize for the lame questions. Time for me to do some more list reading I suppose. Sam -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Excluded files from repos?
On 6/10/08, Sam Drinkard <sam@wa4phy.net> wrote:
> > > Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> Sam Drinkard wrote: >> >>> Ok.. I'm way behind the 8-ball on setting things up correctly, but after >>> going over the protection things in yum, I ran a yum check-update and it >>> returned with having 318 files excluded because of protection. Is that >>> too high a number? I have the numerical protection set to 1. Is there >>> a good tutorial about how to correctly set up the protect base. >>> >> >> I'd go with the priorities plugin. >> >> Everything about Repositories, Protectbase, Priorities and more at: >> >> <http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ralph >> >> > Just to be on the safe side, I installed both plugins and have them > configured now. FWIW, I did a yum check-update and for some unknown > reason, I got no dependency issues and nothing was tagged for update! > Surely the addition of the protectbase and priorities plugins didn't do > that??? > > I appreciate all you all have responded, and apologize for the lame > questions. Time for me to do some more list reading I suppose. Sam: Having both plugins installed is probably *not* a good thing to do. As was previously suggested, probably best to go with Priorities. Read this page: <http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities> I think the number of Packages being excluded (318) is in the ballpark. 73, Lanny _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Excluded files from repos?
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 6/10/08, Sam Drinkard <sam@wa4phy.net> wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Sam Drinkard wrote: Ok.. I'm way behind the 8-ball on setting things up correctly, but after going over the protection things in yum, I ran a yum check-update and it returned with having 318 files excluded because of protection. Is that too high a number? I have the numerical protection set to 1. Is there a good tutorial about how to correctly set up the protect base. I'd go with the priorities plugin. Everything about Repositories, Protectbase, Priorities and more at: <http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/> Cheers, Ralph Just to be on the safe side, I installed both plugins and have them configured now. FWIW, I did a yum check-update and for some unknown reason, I got no dependency issues and nothing was tagged for update! Surely the addition of the protectbase and priorities plugins didn't do that??? I appreciate all you all have responded, and apologize for the lame questions. Time for me to do some more list reading I suppose. Sam: Having both plugins installed is probably *not* a good thing to do. As was previously suggested, probably best to go with Priorities. Read this page: <http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities> I think the number of Packages being excluded (318) is in the ballpark. 73, Lanny Thanks for the tip Lanny. Just set it up and will let it fly with priorities only. Sam _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Excluded files from repos?
I think the number of Packages being excluded (318) is in the ballpark.
73, Lanny _______________________________________________ OT, but wow, Lanny. I haven't seen Phillips code in years :) Thanks for the nostalgia! 73/30 -R _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
Excluded files from repos?
On 6/11/08, Ray Leventhal <centos@swhi.net> wrote:
>> I think the number of Packages being excluded (318) is in the ballpark. >> 73, Lanny >> _______________________________________________ >> > OT, but wow, Lanny. I haven't seen Phillips code in years :) Thanks > for the nostalgia! > > 73/30 > -R Ray: I noticed from his email address that he's an amateur radio operator (Ham). 73 = "Best Regards" for Ham Radio Operators. I learned the Morse Code when I was 11 years old and I can still use it. Lanny _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.