On 07/12/2011 01:11 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:04:41AM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
>> I am more into creating some form of redirect from docs.c.o to
>> upstream's relevant docs.
> Is this permissible now?
IANAL but all their docs are licensed as CC-BY-SA.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:43:11AM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> IANAL but all their docs are licensed as CC-BY-SA.

And at one time they didn't permit deep-linking to content on their
website, open license or not. I'm just wondering if that restriction
has been relaxed.





John

--
We don't have education we have inspiration; if I was educated I would be a
damn fool.

-- Robert Nesta Marley (6 February 1945 - 11 May 1981), better known as Bob
Marley, Jamaican singer, guitarist, songwriter, and social activist, in
Time Will Tell (1992) a documentary by Declan Lowney
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

On 07/11/2011 07:29 PM, Ed Heron wrote:
>
> That sounded like a vote for maintaining CentOS versions of the
> docs...
>

yes please, we should atleast have something there that clearly states
stuff that is not going to work on/for centos, like their management
interface and their mentions of bugzilla.r.c as being the place to
report bugs etc.

depending on how their <img src> are done, we might need to rewrite
those urls, and i seem to remember their page-up and page-down markup
needed some moding way back when we did the c5.0 docs.

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs