subscribed wiki pages
 

I have a few subscribed wiki pages but have never received e-mail
notices when those pages are changed. I remember orc_orc was having
the same issue some time ago. Any hint as to where to look?

Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

subscribed wiki pages
 

On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote:


I have a few subscribed wiki pages but have never received e-mail
notices when those pages are changed. I remember orc_orc was having
the same issue some time ago. Any hint as to where to look?


I still have never received a subscription change notice on
pages I later see have changed.


-- Russ Herrold
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

subscribed wiki pages
 

On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, R P Herrold wrote:

I still have never received a subscription change notice on
pages I later see have changed.


Thinking further, it is possible that I have procmail filters
in play. To help me run this down, could a person actually
having such a notice of change, publish the full headers of a
single piece into this thread, please?


Thanks

-- Russ Herrold
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

subscribed wiki pages
 

On Dec 9, 2007 4:07 PM, R P Herrold <herrold@owlriver.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> > I still have never received a subscription change notice on
> > pages I later see have changed.
>
> Thinking further, it is possible that I have procmail filters
> in play. To help me run this down, could a person actually
> having such a notice of change, publish the full headers of a
> single piece into this thread, please?

This is the header of such a mail :

Delivered-To: tim.verhoeven.be@gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.8.18 with SMTP id 18cs38186anh;
Sat, 8 Dec 2007 12:37:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.67.23.5 with SMTP id a5mr4491929ugj.1197146246471;
Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <noreply@centos.org>
Received: from centosx.centos.org
(162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com [72.232.194.162])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k28si2801837ugd.2007.12.08.12.37.25;
Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 72.232.194.162 is neither permitted
nor denied by best guess record for domain of noreply@centos.org)
client-ip=72.232.194.162;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
72.232.194.162 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record
for domain of noreply@centos.org) smtp.mail=noreply@centos.org
Received: from centosx.centos.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by centosx.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDCA404D;
Sat, 8 Dec 2007 20:37:24 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: noreply@centos.org
To: noreply@centos.org
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:37:24 -0000
Message-ID: <20071208203724.13929.9811@centosx.centos.org>
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCentOS_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22QaTeam=22_by_Fa bianArrotin?=

Regards,
Tim

--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven.be@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83

Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
"microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

subscribed wiki pages
 

On Dec 9, 2007 7:47 AM, Tim Verhoeven <tim.verhoeven.be@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2007 4:07 PM, R P Herrold <herrold@owlriver.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, R P Herrold wrote:
> >
> > > I still have never received a subscription change notice on
> > > pages I later see have changed.
> >
> > Thinking further, it is possible that I have procmail filters
> > in play. To help me run this down, could a person actually
> > having such a notice of change, publish the full headers of a
> > single piece into this thread, please?
>
> This is the header of such a mail :
>
> Delivered-To: tim.verhoeven.be@gmail.com
> Received: by 10.100.8.18 with SMTP id 18cs38186anh;
> Sat, 8 Dec 2007 12:37:27 -0800 (PST)
> Received: by 10.67.23.5 with SMTP id a5mr4491929ugj.1197146246471;
> Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:37:26 -0800 (PST)
> Return-Path: <noreply@centos.org>
> Received: from centosx.centos.org

Russ,

I don't have any filter in place other than those provided by gmail.
And we discussed the possibility of your procmail filter being in
play, you somehow showed a proof that the filter is not the cause of
the problem.

[OT: I suggested the problem would be due to the procfmail filter
being too sophisticated. hughesjr pointed out that your procmail is
sophisticated not by design but due to typos :-D ]

Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

subscribed wiki pages
 

On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Tim Verhoeven wrote:


Thinking further, it is possible that I have procmail filters
in play. To help me run this down, could a person actually
having such a notice of change, publish the full headers of a
single piece into this thread, please?


This is the header of such a mail :


... thank you --


Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"



Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCentOS_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22QaTeam=22_by_Fa bianArrotin?=


strange to have the subject line with the charset again when
the C-T is already explicit and the same. This triggers some
local scoreing; off to amend in a whitelist entry


- Russ
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

subscribed wiki pages
 

On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote:


I don't have any filter in place other than those provided by gmail.
And we discussed the possibility of your procmail filter being in
play, you somehow showed a proof that the filter is not the cause of
the problem.


hmm -- I _hope_ I did not characterize a code walkthrough
review as 'proof' and if so I amend my remark; perhaps a test
;)


- R
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

subscribed wiki pages
 

On Dec 9, 2007 8:33 AM, R P Herrold <herrold@owlriver.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> > I don't have any filter in place other than those provided by gmail.
> > And we discussed the possibility of your procmail filter being in
> > play, you somehow showed a proof that the filter is not the cause of
> > the problem.
>
> hmm -- I _hope_ I did not characterize a code walkthrough
> review as 'proof' and if so I amend my remark; perhaps a test
> ;)
>
> - R

Just to check if gmail's filter is doing something, I have changed my
e-mail address to my work e-mail. I do have procmail running, but I
can look at the log if the mail in question is trapped.

Could someone please edit/change either Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1
or HowTos/FreeNX for me? If I make a change myself, it will not
trigger the mailing.

Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

subscribed wiki pages
 

R P Herrold wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>> Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCentOS_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22QaTeam=22_by_Fa bianArrotin?=
>
> strange to have the subject line with the charset again when the C-T is
> already explicit and the same.

Ah well. Other filters spit, when 8-bit headers are in place :)

And the charset is explicitly for the body *or* mime part it is declared
for - not for the headers.

Though I do not see the need to encode that header.

Ralph
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

subscribed wiki pages
 

On Dec 9, 2007 9:17 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2007 8:33 AM, R P Herrold <herrold@owlriver.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >
> > > I don't have any filter in place other than those provided by gmail.
> > > And we discussed the possibility of your procmail filter being in
> > > play, you somehow showed a proof that the filter is not the cause of
> > > the problem.
> >
> > hmm -- I _hope_ I did not characterize a code walkthrough
> > review as 'proof' and if so I amend my remark; perhaps a test
> > ;)
> >
> > - R
>
> Just to check if gmail's filter is doing something, I have changed my
> e-mail address to my work e-mail. I do have procmail running, but I
> can look at the log if the mail in question is trapped.
>
> Could someone please edit/change either Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1
> or HowTos/FreeNX for me? If I make a change myself, it will not
> trigger the mailing.
>
> Akemi

Heavens, just noticed that Tim is receiving his mail on gmail.com.
So, that cannot be an issue. Also, since no one was helping me, I
helped myself by clicking on the "Mail me my account data" button. I
have not received this e-mail either.

Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs