On 02/28/2012 01:44 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> I just checked my CentOS 5.7 iso, and it's in the same situation; with
> 5.8 being worked, does it make sense to consider this bug entry for 5.8
> ISO creation? Or does a new bug need to be filed?

yes, pleas file a bugreport. We're building the 5.8 isos now ( well, we
already did ) but I'm happy to redo the mkiso's to fix this ownership issue.


--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On 02/28/2012 07:10 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 02/28/2012 01:44 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
>> I just checked my CentOS 5.7 iso, and it's in the same situation; with
>> 5.8 being worked, does it make sense to consider this bug entry for 5.8
>> ISO creation? Or does a new bug need to be filed?
> yes, pleas file a bugreport. We're building the 5.8 isos now ( well, we
> already did ) but I'm happy to redo the mkiso's to fix this ownership issue.

http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5557

thanks Karanbir.

-Greg

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On 02/28/2012 02:22 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
>> already did ) but I'm happy to redo the mkiso's to fix this ownership issue.
>
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5557
>

new iso build scripts kicked off, ETA to QA is about 3 hrs from now.

- KB

--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel