Linux Archive

Linux Archive (http://www.linux-archive.org/)
-   CentOS Development (http://www.linux-archive.org/centos-development/)
-   -   CentOS plus kernel-devel x86_64 with incomplete Module.symvers? (http://www.linux-archive.org/centos-development/637864-centos-plus-kernel-devel-x86_64-incomplete-module-symvers.html)

Manuel Wolfshant 02-26-2012 09:08 PM

CentOS plus kernel-devel x86_64 with incomplete Module.symvers?
 
On 02/26/2012 07:58 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Thomas Jacob<jacob@internet24.de> wrote:
>> On Feb 26, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Thomas Jacob<jacob@internet24.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> However this is not a centosplus kernel. It should say:
>>>
>>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.centos.plus.x86_64/Module.symvers
>>>
>>> And I see:
>>>
>>> $ awk '{print $4;}'
>>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.centos.plus.x86_64/Module.symvers
>>> | sort | uniq -c
>>> 6193 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>> 3897 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>>
>> Oh yes, sorry about that, I seem to have mixed this up with
>> the "updates" packages of CentOS proper.
>>
>> So is this an RHEL upstream problem then? Sorry I am rather
>> new to the CentOS package building intrinsics ....
> I don't think this problem exists in the RHEL kernel. Could someone
> check the distro CentOS 2.6.32-220.4.2.el6 kernel?
[wolfy@wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}'
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
[wolfy@wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}'
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
[root@DB ~]# awk '{print $4;}'
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.i686/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
6124 EXPORT_SYMBOL
3706 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

Manuel Wolfshant 02-26-2012 09:11 PM

CentOS plus kernel-devel x86_64 with incomplete Module.symvers?
 
On 02/27/2012 12:08 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 02/26/2012 07:58 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Thomas Jacob<jacob@internet24.de>
>> wrote:
>>> On Feb 26, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Thomas Jacob<jacob@internet24.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> However this is not a centosplus kernel. It should say:
>>>>
>>>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.centos.plus.x86_64/Module.symvers
>>>>
>>>> And I see:
>>>>
>>>> $ awk '{print $4;}'
>>>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.centos.plus.x86_64/Module.symvers
>>>> | sort | uniq -c
>>>> 6193 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>>> 3897 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>>>
>>> Oh yes, sorry about that, I seem to have mixed this up with
>>> the "updates" packages of CentOS proper.
>>>
>>> So is this an RHEL upstream problem then? Sorry I am rather
>>> new to the CentOS package building intrinsics ....
>> I don't think this problem exists in the RHEL kernel. Could someone
>> check the distro CentOS 2.6.32-220.4.2.el6 kernel?
> [wolfy@wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}'
> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort |
> uniq -c
> 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
> 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
> [wolfy@wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}'
> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort |
> uniq -c
> 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
> 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
> [root@DB ~]# awk '{print $4;}'
> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.i686/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
> 6124 EXPORT_SYMBOL
> 3706 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>
Sorry for not mentioning: all 3 above are pure centos kernels. And the
number of symbols does not coincide with the ones from the original post...

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

Manuel Wolfshant 02-27-2012 07:40 AM

CentOS plus kernel-devel x86_64 with incomplete Module.symvers?
 
On 02/27/2012 01:37 AM, Thomas Göttgens wrote:
> Guten Tag Manuel,
>
> you threw in a 686 kernel at the 3rd prompt :-) - Still the numbers
> differ from the OP...
On purpose. Results taken from a different machine with different arch.
The original poster used results for 32 bits and I wanted to rule out
smtg specific to a particular arch.


> [root@pegasus ~]# awk '{print $4;}' /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
> 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
> 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>
>> [wolfy@wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}'
>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>> 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>> 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>> [wolfy@wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}'
>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>> 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>> 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>> [root@DB ~]# awk '{print $4;}'
>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.i686/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c
>> 6124 EXPORT_SYMBOL
>> 3706 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
>


--
Manuel Wolfshant linux registered user #131416
IT manager NoBug Consulting SRL
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?


_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:15 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.