FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > CentOS > CentOS Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 10-21-2011, 02:38 PM
"Alexey Asemov (Alex/AT)"
 
Default cr/SRPMS/Packages/ empty

> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.0/cr/i386/RPMS/ has packages but
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.0/cr/SRPMS/Packages/ remains empty.

/join

Please, put at least some SRPMS here Most interesting are net-base:
kernel, iptables, tc, ifconfig, ppp, rp-pppoe and all such - people are
updating their patches for 6.1 out there (I'm among them) and it may be
nice to have sources to know what awaits us.

Thanks.

--
Regards,
Alexey Asemov (Alex/AT)
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 10-21-2011, 03:02 PM
Manuel Wolfshant
 
Default cr/SRPMS/Packages/ empty

On 10/21/2011 05:38 PM, Alexey Asemov (Alex/AT) wrote:
>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.0/cr/i386/RPMS/ has packages but
>> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.0/cr/SRPMS/Packages/ remains empty.
> /join
>
> Please, put at least some SRPMS here Most interesting are net-base:
> kernel, iptables, tc, ifconfig, ppp, rp-pppoe and all such - people are
> updating their patches for 6.1 out there (I'm among them) and it may be
> nice to have sources to know what awaits us.
except for the packages which must be modified by CentOS (and therefore
must be patched before building ), all sources are available on
ftp.redhat.com.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 10-24-2011, 09:53 PM
Tetsuo Handa
 
Default cr/SRPMS/Packages/ empty

Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 05:38 PM, Alexey Asemov (Alex/AT) wrote:
> >> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.0/cr/i386/RPMS/ has packages but
> >> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.0/cr/SRPMS/Packages/ remains empty.
> > /join
> >
> > Please, put at least some SRPMS here Most interesting are net-base:
> > kernel, iptables, tc, ifconfig, ppp, rp-pppoe and all such - people are
> > updating their patches for 6.1 out there (I'm among them) and it may be
> > nice to have sources to know what awaits us.

I'm waiting for kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.src.rpm .

> except for the packages which must be modified by CentOS (and therefore
> must be patched before building ), all sources are available on
> ftp.redhat.com.

Was i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.i686.rpm made by simply doing

wget http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.src.rpm
rpmbuild --rebuild kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.src.rpm

? Regarding kernel-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.src.rpm , there was a small
difference in the spec file and dynamically generated files.

--- kernel-rh.spec
+++ kernel-centos.spec
@@ -947,3 +947,3 @@
fi
-gpg --homedir . --export --keyring ./kernel.pub Red > extract.pub
+gpg --homedir . --export --keyring ./kernel.pub CentOS > extract.pub
gcc -o scripts/bin2c scripts/bin2c.c
@@ -1656,2 +1656,5 @@
%changelog
+* Mon Jun 27 2011 Karanbir Singh <kbsingh@centos.org> [2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.centos]
+- Roll in CentOS Branding
+
* Thu Apr 21 2011 Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com> [2.6.32-71.29.1.el6]

linux-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686/.config | 2
linux-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686/configs/kernel-2.6.32-i686-debug.config | 2
linux-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686/configs/kernel-2.6.32-i686.config | 2
linux-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686/crypto/signature/key.h | 109 +++-------
linux-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686/extract.pub |binary
linux-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686/kernel.pub |binary
linux-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686/kernel.pub~ |binary
linux-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686/kernel.sec |binary
linux-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.i686/random_seed |binary
vanilla-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6/crypto/signature/key.h | 109 +++-------
vanilla-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6/extract.pub |binary
vanilla-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6/kernel.pub |binary
vanilla-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6/kernel.sec |binary
vanilla-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6/random_seed |binary
14 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 10-24-2011, 10:08 PM
"Ilya A. Otyutskiy"
 
Default cr/SRPMS/Packages/ empty

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Tetsuo Handa
<from-centos@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
>> except for the packages which must be modified by CentOS (and therefore
>> must be patched before building ), all sources are available on
>> ftp.redhat.com.
>
> Was i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.i686.rpm made by simply doing
>
> *wget http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.src.rpm
> *rpmbuild --rebuild kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.src.rpm

You will get stock RHEL kernel by doing that. Anyways, why do you need
exactly centos kernel? As you can see below -- it's just stock RHEL
one but with some slight changes which doesn't affect functionality.

> --- kernel-rh.spec
> +++ kernel-centos.spec
> +* Mon Jun 27 2011 Karanbir Singh <kbsingh@centos.org> [2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.centos]
> +- Roll in CentOS Branding

--
SY, Ilya A. Otyutskiy aka Sharp
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 10-25-2011, 12:35 AM
Akemi Yagi
 
Default cr/SRPMS/Packages/ empty

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Tetsuo Handa
<from-centos@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:

> I'm waiting for kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.src.rpm .

> ? Regarding kernel-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.src.rpm , there was a small
> difference in the spec file and dynamically generated files.
>
> --- kernel-rh.spec
> +++ kernel-centos.spec
> @@ -947,3 +947,3 @@
> *fi
> -gpg --homedir . --export --keyring ./kernel.pub Red > extract.pub
> +gpg --homedir . --export --keyring ./kernel.pub CentOS > extract.pub
> *gcc -o scripts/bin2c scripts/bin2c.c
> @@ -1656,2 +1656,5 @@
> *%changelog
> +* Mon Jun 27 2011 Karanbir Singh <kbsingh@centos.org> [2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.centos]
> +- Roll in CentOS Branding
> +
> ** Thu Apr 21 2011 Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com> [2.6.32-71.29.1.el6]

In addition to the above, one line in the genkey file is modified by CentOS:

Name-Real: CentOS

Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 10-25-2011, 09:31 AM
Karanbir Singh
 
Default cr/SRPMS/Packages/ empty

On 10/24/2011 10:53 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>>> Please, put at least some SRPMS here Most interesting are net-base:
>>> kernel, iptables, tc, ifconfig, ppp, rp-pppoe and all such - people are
>>> updating their patches for 6.1 out there (I'm among them) and it may be
>>> nice to have sources to know what awaits us.
> I'm waiting for kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.src.rpm .

We have enough ( but barely enough ) space on the mirrors for
6.0/cr/SRPMS; however that would then mean that we no longer have enough
space to get 6.1 on there.

So just to keep with the theme of things, what is the feeling if I were :
- to drop the CR/SRPMS into vault.c.o
- add a .repo stanza into the centos-release-cr rpm with a [sources]
pointing to the right place

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 10-25-2011, 12:18 PM
Tetsuo Handa
 
Default cr/SRPMS/Packages/ empty

Ilya A. Otyutskiy wrote:
> You will get stock RHEL kernel by doing that. Anyways, why do you need
> exactly centos kernel? As you can see below -- it's just stock RHEL
> one but with some slight changes which doesn't affect functionality.

Just wanted to rebuild with TOMOYO enabled. To do so, I wanted to know
what modification is required for reusing upstream packages.



Akemi Yagi wrote:
> In addition to the above, one line in the genkey file is modified by CentOS:
>
> Name-Real: CentOS

Thanks Akemi. So, roughly speaking centos's kernel srpm is made with

sed -i -e 's@--keyring ./kernel.pub Red@--keyring ./kernel.pub CentOS@' -- SPECS/kernel.spec
sed -i -e 's@Red Hat, Inc.@CentOS@' -- SOURCES/genkey

.



Karanbir Singh wrote:
> We have enough ( but barely enough ) space on the mirrors for
> 6.0/cr/SRPMS; however that would then mean that we no longer have enough
> space to get 6.1 on there.

I see. The reason the directory remains empty is to save disk space.

> So just to keep with the theme of things, what is the feeling if I were :
> - to drop the CR/SRPMS into vault.c.o
> - add a .repo stanza into the centos-release-cr rpm with a [sources]
> pointing to the right place

I'm fine with that approach.



Thanks.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 10-25-2011, 01:14 PM
 
Default cr/SRPMS/Packages/ empty

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote:

> On 10/24/2011 10:53 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>>>> Please, put at least some SRPMS here Most interesting are net-base:
>>>> kernel, iptables, tc, ifconfig, ppp, rp-pppoe and all such - people are
>>>> updating their patches for 6.1 out there (I'm among them) and it may be
>>>> nice to have sources to know what awaits us.
>> I'm waiting for kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.src.rpm .
>
> We have enough ( but barely enough ) space on the mirrors for
> 6.0/cr/SRPMS; however that would then mean that we no longer have enough
> space to get 6.1 on there.
>
> So just to keep with the theme of things, what is the feeling if I were :
> - to drop the CR/SRPMS into vault.c.o
> - add a .repo stanza into the centos-release-cr rpm with a [sources]
> pointing to the right place

I think that is a good idea. It should not matter to anyone where the srpms are
physically located as long as they are accessible.

In addition, given that the sprms used to build most of the distro are
unmodified from the upstream versions, do you even need to distribute
them? Since I am not a lawyer I do not know the answer but it would seem
to me that if you made the srpms you modify available that would be good
enough.

I am sure some lawyer wannabee will complain about this. People always seem to
find something to whine about but if you could do that it would save a bunch
of disk space. Which is a good thing IMO.

Just my $.02

Regards,

--
Tom me@tdiehl.org Spamtrap address me123@tdiehl.org
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 10-25-2011, 03:58 PM
Karanbir Singh
 
Default cr/SRPMS/Packages/ empty

On 10/25/2011 01:18 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> I see. The reason the directory remains empty is to save disk space.

The issue is a bit wider than that, but in effect its a case of keeping
mirror size down.

> So just to keep with the theme of things, what is the feeling if I were :
>> - to drop the CR/SRPMS into vault.c.o
>> - add a .repo stanza into the centos-release-cr rpm with a [sources]
>> pointing to the right place
>
> I'm fine with that approach.

I'll work on getting this done for later today; it might be a while
before the srpms show up ( give it a day or two ).

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 10-25-2011, 03:59 PM
Karanbir Singh
 
Default cr/SRPMS/Packages/ empty

On 10/25/2011 02:14 PM, me@tdiehl.org wrote:
> In addition, given that the sprms used to build most of the distro are
> unmodified from the upstream versions, do you even need to distribute
> them? Since I am not a lawyer I do not know the answer but it would seem
> to me that if you made the srpms you modify available that would be good
> enough.

I think lets avoid that conversation completely by just pushing out all
the srpms / debugs to match what comes from our builds,

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:22 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org