CentOS 6 location does not have symlink to 6.0 cr
 

Is this intentional or something missed? Kind proves an earlier point I made that a single swap of symlink from

6 -> 6.0

to

6 -> 6.1

as more effective way of ensuring correctness than

6/centosplus -> 6.0/centosplus
6/contrib -> 6.0/contrib
...

if this is by mistake. ;)

--
James A. Peltier
IT Services - Research Computing Group
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone : 778-782-6573
Fax : 778-782-3045
E-Mail : jpeltier@sfu.ca
Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices
http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier
I will do the best I can with the talent I have

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

CentOS 6 location does not have symlink to 6.0 cr
 

On 09/14/2011 07:09 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> Is this intentional or something missed? Kind proves an earlier point I made that a single swap of symlink from
>

intentional at this point. You will see the /6/cr/ as soon as there are
rpms publicly visible and consumable in there.

I would love to hear your comments on my post w.r.t the symlink issue on
the centos list.

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel