package centos-release-10:5-6.el5.centos.1.x86_64 newer than centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64
 

On 07/10/2011 10:44 PM, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> hi,
>
> i know c6 it is not released, but centos-release packages
> was not upgraded when doing upgrade from 5.6 to 6.0
> (using upgradeany option).
>
> [root@server Packages]# rpm -Uvh centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm
> warning: centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c105b9de: NOKEY
> Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
> package centos-release-10:5-6.el5.centos.1.x86_64 (which is newer than centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64) is already installed
>
> i assume this was not tested because this upgrade method is not supported by upstream vendor.

even though seems to be a serious bug:-(
btw. not supported but working most of the cases.

--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

package centos-release-10:5-6.el5.centos.1.x86_64 newer than centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64
 

On 07/10/2011 11:12 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 10:44 PM, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> i know c6 it is not released, but centos-release packages
>> was not upgraded when doing upgrade from 5.6 to 6.0
>> (using upgradeany option).
>>
>> [root@server Packages]# rpm -Uvh centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm
>> warning: centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c105b9de: NOKEY
>> Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
>> package centos-release-10:5-6.el5.centos.1.x86_64 (which is newer than centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64) is already installed
>>
>> i assume this was not tested because this upgrade method is not supported by upstream vendor.
>
> even though seems to be a serious bug:-(
> btw. not supported but working most of the cases.

Why is this a bug? Afaik an epoch of 10 (the C5 rpm) trumps an epoch of
0 (the C6 rpm). 10 > 0 so do not upgrade.

Regards,
Patrick

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

package centos-release-10:5-6.el5.centos.1.x86_64 newer than centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64
 

On 07/11/2011 12:30 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 11:12 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 07/10/2011 10:44 PM, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> i know c6 it is not released, but centos-release packages
>>> was not upgraded when doing upgrade from 5.6 to 6.0
>>> (using upgradeany option).
>>>
>>> [root@server Packages]# rpm -Uvh centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm
>>> warning: centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c105b9de: NOKEY
>>> Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
>>> package centos-release-10:5-6.el5.centos.1.x86_64 (which is newer than centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64) is already installed
>>>
>>> i assume this was not tested because this upgrade method is not supported by upstream vendor.
>>
>> even though seems to be a serious bug:-(
>> btw. not supported but working most of the cases.
>
> Why is this a bug? Afaik an epoch of 10 (the C5 rpm) trumps an epoch of
> 0 (the C6 rpm). 10 > 0 so do not upgrade.

and that's the problem...

--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel