Upstream has released three Errata which have not (yet?) made it into CentOS

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0178.html (openldap Bugfix)
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0182.html (openoffice.org Important)
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0186.html (gdb Bugfix)

Are these missed, skipped or maybe in build or qa?
Sorry if that was already brought up on the list earlier.

Regards,
Andreas

--
Solvention Ltd. & Co. KG
Egermannstr. 6-8
53359 Rheinbach

Tel: +49 2226 158179-0
Fax: +49 2226 158179-9

http://www.solvention.de
mailto:info@solvention.de
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On 05/06/2011 07:21 AM, Andreas Rogge wrote:
> Upstream has released three Errata which have not (yet?) made it into CentOS
>
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0178.html (openldap Bugfix)

outdated by:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0346.html (released)


> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0182.html (openoffice.org Important)

Upstream did a el5_5 update, then released 5.6 (with an older version of
openoffice.org that that el5_5 update). Because of that, this was
missed, building now.

> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0186.html (gdb Bugfix)

Building now. Not sure how this one was missed.

>
> Are these missed, skipped or maybe in build or qa?
> Sorry if that was already brought up on the list earlier.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>

Thanks for the input, I'll get this taken care of today.

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

> > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0182.html (openoffice.org Important)
>
> Upstream did a el5_5 update, then released 5.6 (with an older version of
> openoffice.org that that el5_5 update). Because of that, this was
> missed, building now.

This went from openoffice.org-3.1.1-19.5.el5.src.rpm to
openoffice.org-3.1.1-19.5.el5_5.6.src.rpm with a normal
version number update and openoffice itself is unchanged with
only a few bugfixes added.

> > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0186.html (gdb Bugfix)
>
> Building now. Not sure how this one was missed.

Seems it is not on ftp.redhat.com. Who wants to write a script to
download all errata html pages and verify the src.rpms are all
released properly?

> Thanks for the input, I'll get this taken care of today.

Thanks a lot,

Florian La Roche

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Florian La Roche
<Florian.LaRoche@gmx.net> wrote:
>> > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0186.html (gdb Bugfix)
>>
>> Building now. Not sure how this one was missed.
>
> Seems it is not on ftp.redhat.com. Who wants to write a script to
> download all errata html pages and verify the src.rpms are all
> released properly?
>

I believe KB already has a script. Is this public somewhere?

I've filed a number of bugs on the RH BZ for missing packages. This
one in particular hasn't been touched:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696670

-Jeff
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On 05/06/2011 12:32 PM, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Florian La Roche
> <Florian.LaRoche@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0186.html (gdb Bugfix)
>>>
>>> Building now. Not sure how this one was missed.
>>
>> Seems it is not on ftp.redhat.com. Who wants to write a script to
>> download all errata html pages and verify the src.rpms are all
>> released properly?
>>
>
> I believe KB already has a script. Is this public somewhere?
>
> I've filed a number of bugs on the RH BZ for missing packages. This
> one in particular hasn't been touched:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696670

OK, that explains why we didn't build it ...

I will obtain a copy from "somewhere else" and get this built today.

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On 05/06/2011 10:56 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 07:21 AM, Andreas Rogge wrote:
>> Upstream has released three Errata which have not (yet?) made it into CentOS
>>
>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0178.html (openldap Bugfix)
>
> outdated by:
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0346.html (released)
>

For the record, the openldap SRPM for that missed update is also not
released by Red Hat on their FTP server, this is the missing version:

openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_6.5.src.rpm

(If you look, you will see that there are
openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_6.5.src.rpm and
openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_5.7.src.rpm but no
openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_6.5.src.rpm)

So, this is another missing SRPM.

We contact upstream every time we see one of these, but are kind of at
their mercy if they don't follow up.

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On 05/07/2011 07:27 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 10:56 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 05/06/2011 07:21 AM, Andreas Rogge wrote:
>>> Upstream has released three Errata which have not (yet?) made it into CentOS
>>>
>>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0178.html (openldap Bugfix)
>>
>> outdated by:
>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0346.html (released)
>>
>
> For the record, the openldap SRPM for that missed update is also not
> released by Red Hat on their FTP server, this is the missing version:
>
> openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_6.5.src.rpm
>
> (If you look, you will see that there are
> openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_6.5.src.rpm and
> openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_5.7.src.rpm but no
> openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_6.5.src.rpm)
>
> So, this is another missing SRPM.
>
> We contact upstream every time we see one of these, but are kind of at
> their mercy if they don't follow up.

I meant openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_6.3.src.rpm and a .7 but no .5

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@centos.org> wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 10:56 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 05/06/2011 07:21 AM, Andreas Rogge wrote:
>>> Upstream has released three Errata which have not (yet?) made it into CentOS
>>>
>>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0178.html (openldap Bugfix)
>>
>> outdated by:
>> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0346.html *(released)
>>
>
> For the record, the openldap SRPM for that missed update is also not
> released by Red Hat on their FTP server

Here's the bug I filed for the missing openldap package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696684

-Jeff
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel