FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > CentOS > CentOS Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 11-29-2010, 03:36 AM
Hubert Bahr
 
Default build errors with RHEL6 packages

On 11/13/2010 02:17 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 11/13/2010 08:25 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>/ - what os, version do you use on build hosts?
/>
> CentOS-5.5

>>/ - which version of mock and ccache do you use?
/
> no ccache, mock-0.6.3

>/ - and what mock config do you use?
/
> nothing interesting in the mock configs.

If there is nothing interesting in the mock configs why not share them.
The config really defines the build environment not the host and not necessarily
the version of mock. It is the default installs + the packages to meet dependancies
and where they come from.

>>/ since it's well known that there are some packages (like bash, nss)
/
? because you have those problems, does not mean everyone else will.

>>/ which can not be build in mock on rhel-6:
/>>/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613392
/>>/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609201
/>>/ so it's rather strange that build complete without issues.
/
> Speak to the people who have the problems ? These packages have all
> clearly built not only for fedora, but also for red hat - and going by
> the changelogs, quite a few times.

> - KB
Since I have built all but 36 packages on both 1686 and x86_64 with rpmbuild
I am very interested in resolving the differences in build environments.
Once I too have a stable build environment I would be interested in working on the
rebranding etc. But I would like to be able to test and make sure my changes are
not causing the problems not the Build environment. I am building on RHEL6 + updates.

Hubert

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 11-29-2010, 11:52 AM
Karanbir Singh
 
Default build errors with RHEL6 packages

On 11/29/2010 04:36 AM, Hubert Bahr wrote:
> I am very interested in resolving the differences in build environments.
> Once I too have a stable build environment I would be interested in working on the
> rebranding etc. But I would like to be able to test and make sure my changes are

its the sources that need to be audited, not the binaries.

besides, don't use static mock roots anyway in CentOS, never have. Don't
have the luxury of that level of simplicity

once we have a bit of breathing time, I'll get all the code that is
being used here published. Till then, its focus on getting release.

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 11-29-2010, 03:34 PM
Hubert Bahr
 
Default build errors with RHEL6 packages

Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 04:36 AM, Hubert Bahr wrote:
>
>> I am very interested in resolving the differences in build environments.
>> Once I too have a stable build environment I would be interested in working on the
>> rebranding etc. But I would like to be able to test and make sure my changes are
>>
>
> its the sources that need to be audited, not the binaries.
>
> besides, don't use static mock roots anyway in CentOS, never have. Don't
> have the luxury of that level of simplicity
>
>
Thanks, That gives me more insight into the process. Non static mock
root implies
that changes are necessary to do a complete build.
Hubert
> once we have a bit of breathing time, I'll get all the code that is
> being used here published. Till then, its focus on getting release.
>
> - KB
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 12-02-2010, 01:18 AM
Karanbir Singh
 
Default build errors with RHEL6 packages

On 11/29/2010 04:34 PM, Hubert Bahr wrote:
>> besides, don't use static mock roots anyway in CentOS, never have. Don't
>> have the luxury of that level of simplicity
> Thanks, That gives me more insight into the process. Non static mock
> root implies
> that changes are necessary to do a complete build.

With EL6 there have been some really strange build roots as well, we
might need to make a pragmatic call at some stage on how-to work with or
without those. One of the most odd ones is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644778

where buildroots even for the same package were different on different
architectures; in this case, it 'feels' like its because of the rolling
builds where queues ran independently for different architectures. And
there is no clean way of working around this, unless you don't mind
cross builds waiting for a sync 'pulse' for each package.

Can be mitigated to some extent by running packages-as-tasks rather than
builds-as-tasks; but then were now talking about spiritual issues
subject to wildly divergent interpretation.

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 12-02-2010, 10:16 PM
Leonard den Ottolander
 
Default build errors with RHEL6 packages

Hi Karanbir,

On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 02:18 +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> With EL6 there have been some really strange build roots as well, we
> might need to make a pragmatic call at some stage on how-to work with or
> without those. One of the most odd ones is
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644778

That one looks very similar to the one I reported here in the thread
about file conflicts from an x86_64 and i686 build I did.

That issue turned out to be caused by the fact that in my base system I
did not have redhat-rpm-config installed and in the mock build root it
did get pulled in, so in the latter
%_binary_filedigest_algorithm 8
got set. My conclusion was that rpm can't compare the resulting doc and
config files as being equal as they use different checksum mechanisms.

Regards,
Leonard.

--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 12-02-2010, 11:00 PM
Leonard den Ottolander
 
Default build errors with RHEL6 packages

On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 00:16 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> That one looks very similar to the one I reported here in the thread
> about file conflicts from an x86_64 and i686 build I did.

Never mind. Same errors, different cause.

Regards,
Leonard.

--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org