On 11/26/2010 05:54 PM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> +1 for an optional repository.
> I like the name
I am not sold on the idea of calling it 'optional' - as mentioned
before, we dont really have a supported and optional model in CentOS.
Does everyone really want to go with the 'optional' name ?
> Besides that I am not a fan of different installation medias for
> workstation and server. One of the advantages of CentOS always was to
> allow installation of both with one media kit.
CentOS-devel mailing list