FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > CentOS > CentOS Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 11-19-2010, 10:16 AM
Timo Schoeler
 
Default build errors with some RHEL6 packages

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

thus Hugo van der Kooij spake:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:57:58 -0500 (EST), Charlie Brady
> <charlieb-centos-devel@budge.apana.org.au> wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>> couple of weeks after 6 is released.
>> So, in about a week, eh?
>
> Dream on. I just requested a 30 day eval. And all I can get is a Beta
> of RHEL6. So it seems RHEL 6 is not realy realy there yet. It almost
> sounds like another OS vendor ;-)

I got mine without any problems. It's not beta.

Timo

> Hugo.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFM5lxyfg746kcGBOwRAjitAKCX+cDJoukZHBvKAOH2+8 eXs6Y42ACgk/ZL
Hdnom9cgSYC9CVk7/ZFq0i0=
=ESml
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 11-19-2010, 10:18 AM
Lennert Buytenhek
 
Default build errors with some RHEL6 packages

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:08:01PM +0200, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:

> >> couple of weeks after 6 is released.
> >
> > So, in about a week, eh?
>
> Dream on. I just requested a 30 day eval. And all I can get is a Beta
> of RHEL6. So it seems RHEL 6 is not realy realy there yet.

That's just because the RHN web page design sucks.

The item next to the [-] is also clickable.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 11-19-2010, 07:30 PM
Douglas McClendon
 
Default build errors with some RHEL6 packages

On 11/19/2010 05:16 AM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> thus Hugo van der Kooij spake:
>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:57:58 -0500 (EST), Charlie Brady
>> <charlieb-centos-devel@budge.apana.org.au> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>
>>>> couple of weeks after 6 is released.
>>> So, in about a week, eh?
>>
>> Dream on. I just requested a 30 day eval. And all I can get is a Beta
>> of RHEL6. So it seems RHEL 6 is not realy realy there yet. It almost
>> sounds like another OS vendor ;-)
>
> I got mine without any problems. It's not beta.

I submitted my request last saturday, getting the automated confirmation
email telling me I'd get my 2 port activation soon. Nothing yet. I
think YMMV, perhaps depending on how they profile you. I would guess
there is a minimal human intervention in this process, and things are
triaged by your profiled importance as a customer.

I know it probably won't happen, but I would love to see early access to
round1 packages or the like. I know all the reasons it won't happen,
but it would be nice. beta2 I'm guessing would start causing me
problems around the time I decided I really wanted to use something from
epel.

-dmc


>
> Timo
>
>> Hugo.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFM5lxyfg746kcGBOwRAjitAKCX+cDJoukZHBvKAOH2+8 eXs6Y42ACgk/ZL
> Hdnom9cgSYC9CVk7/ZFq0i0=
> =ESml
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 
Old 12-10-2010, 09:28 AM
Farkas Levente
 
Default build errors with some RHEL6 packages

On 11/12/2010 01:14 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 10:42 AM, Sergio Rubio wrote:
>> Good morning everyone,
>>
>> I'm having some problems rebuilding some RHEL6 packages from:
>>
>> http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6/en/source/SRPMS/
>>
>
> First round of builds completed here with no issues.

this statement is rather strange after having a dozen of packages which
is well-known not build under mock #661775 #661784 #661804 #621089
#657567 etc. because of different missing BRs and other problems.
not to mention virt-top which depend on ocaml-camomile-data which is
neither on rhn nor on ftp site, so simple missing from rhel-6. #661783
ie. this src.rpm is impossible to build on rhel or centos without fedora
or epel packages.

so dare i ask what do you mean by "completed here with no issues" and
what packages used in your mock buildroot's yum base?

--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:52 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org