In addition, an `eclipse' group is listed in category `apps', a
`workstation' group is listed in category `base-system', but these two
groups are not defined in comps.xml.
I know that some packages only exist in one arch, e.g. apmd, s390utils,
etc, but what about the others? Do we really need to keep them in the
comps.xml file?
Best regards,
Hao
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
06-27-2008, 08:16 AM
Karanbir Singh
Question about CentOS 5 comps.xml
Hao Xu wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> The following packages are listed in CentOS 5.2 comps.xml but cannot be
> found in CentOS 5.2 i386 release Base repo:
>
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hao Xu wrote:
>> The following packages are listed in CentOS 5.2 comps.xml but cannot be
>> found in CentOS 5.2 i386 release Base repo:
>
> What problem are you trying to fix ?
I don't think that there's any suggestion that someone is remiss for not
having cleaned them out; I get the feeling he's just curious why they're
missing.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
06-27-2008, 01:33 PM
Hao Xu
Question about CentOS 5 comps.xml
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hao Xu wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> The following packages are listed in CentOS 5.2 comps.xml but cannot be
>> found in CentOS 5.2 i386 release Base repo:
>>
>>
>
> What problem are you trying to fix ?
>
I'm not trying to fix a problem. I'm just asking whether this is a
problem or not.
Hao
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
06-27-2008, 02:56 PM
Johnny Hughes
Question about CentOS 5 comps.xml
Hao Xu wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Hao Xu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>
>>> The following packages are listed in CentOS 5.2 comps.xml but cannot be
>>> found in CentOS 5.2 i386 release Base repo:
>>>
>>>
>> What problem are you trying to fix ?
>>
>
> I'm not trying to fix a problem. I'm just asking whether this is a
> problem or not.
RPMS named in comps and not in the tree are ignored. These files are in
at least one of the upstream comps files for RHEL5 (server, workstation,
client, cluser, cluster-storage, virtualization, etc.) and therefore are
in the one for CentOS as well.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
06-27-2008, 05:41 PM
Hao Xu
Question about CentOS 5 comps.xml
Johnny Hughes 写道:
> Hao Xu wrote:
>
>> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>> Hao Xu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The following packages are listed in CentOS 5.2 comps.xml but cannot be
>>>> found in CentOS 5.2 i386 release Base repo:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What problem are you trying to fix ?
>>>
>>>
>> I'm not trying to fix a problem. I'm just asking whether this is a
>> problem or not.
>>
>
> RPMS named in comps and not in the tree are ignored. These files are in
> at least one of the upstream comps files for RHEL5 (server, workstation,
> client, cluser, cluster-storage, virtualization, etc.) and therefore are
> in the one for CentOS as well.
>
What about `notify-daemon' in comps.xml but `notification-daemon' rpm in
the tree? Is this a bug?
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Question about CentOS 5 comps.xml
