FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 04-23-2008, 04:11 PM
"Ray Rashif"
 
Default Shinlun

I don't know when he last updated anything but at least 20-21 of his packages are outdated. If he's still active then it's alright, maybe he deems the packages stable as they are. If not, and no other TU adopts them, then I could take on the following 12:


ardourvst
dssi-vst
lash
libgig
linuxsampler
lmms
pd
qsampler
qtractor
traverso
vkeybd
wineasio
 
Old 04-23-2008, 05:46 PM
Eric Belanger
 
Default Shinlun

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, BaSh wrote:


Hi,
2008/4/23 Ray Rashif <schivmeister@gmail.com>:

I don't know when he last updated anything but at least 20-21 of his
packages are outdated. If he's still active then it's alright, maybe he
deems the packages stable as they are.


I've checked the Trusted Users wiki page.
In 29th January 2008 shinlun had changed the status from Active to Inactive.
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Trusted_Users&diff=35890&oldid=358 77

I don't know if he should be candidate for removal.
However i've updated lmms and his others package OutOfDate into community.

Regards,
Andrea



According to TU bylaws:
TUs are expected to step down altogether if they plan on becoming inactive
for a period longer than 2 months.


shinlun has been inactive for more than two months. You could email him to
ask about his status. If you don't get any answer, you could remove
him.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
 
Old 04-23-2008, 05:50 PM
BaSh
 
Default Shinlun

Hi,
2008/4/23 Ray Rashif <schivmeister@gmail.com>:
> I don't know when he last updated anything but at least 20-21 of his
> packages are outdated. If he's still active then it's alright, maybe he
> deems the packages stable as they are.

I've checked the Trusted Users wiki page.
In 29th January 2008 shinlun had changed the status from Active to Inactive.
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Trusted_Users&diff=35890&oldid=358 77

I don't know if he should be candidate for removal.
However i've updated lmms and his others package OutOfDate into community.

Regards,
Andrea

--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Trusted User
Linux User: #430842
 
Old 04-23-2008, 05:57 PM
Firmicus
 
Default Shinlun

2008/4/23 Ray Rashif <schivmeister@gmail.com>:


I don't know when he last updated anything but at least 20-21 of his
packages are outdated. If he's still active then it's alright, maybe he
deems the packages stable as they are.



I've checked the Trusted Users wiki page.
In 29th January 2008 shinlun had changed the status from Active to Inactive.
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Trusted_Users&diff=35890&oldid=358 77

I don't know if he should be candidate for removal.
However i've updated lmms and his others package OutOfDate into community.

Regards,
Andrea



Quoting from his message to this list on January 29:

Actually I'm pretty busy with my personal job and product schedule
these days and would be inactive for a while. I thought about taking
this package though. Hope TUs interested in this could help Qianqian
on this.


Sorry for the inconvenience; I'll be back very soon.

Regards,
Shinlun


Obviously "very soon" turned out to be "not so soon", but let's first
wait until he replies himself.


F
 
Old 04-24-2008, 06:37 AM
"Ray Rashif"
 
Default Shinlun

Thanks Andrea! Well, at least he mentioned it - so it should be fine.
 
Old 04-24-2008, 02:14 PM
Shinlun Hsieh
 
Default Shinlun

Firmicus wrote:



2008/4/23 Ray Rashif <schivmeister@gmail.com>:


I don't know when he last updated anything but at least 20-21 of his
packages are outdated. If he's still active then it's alright, maybe he
deems the packages stable as they are.



I've checked the Trusted Users wiki page.
In 29th January 2008 shinlun had changed the status from Active to
Inactive.
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Trusted_Users&diff=35890&oldid=358 77



I don't know if he should be candidate for removal.
However i've updated lmms and his others package OutOfDate into
community.


Regards,
Andrea



Quoting from his message to this list on January 29:

Actually I'm pretty busy with my personal job and product schedule
these days and would be inactive for a while. I thought about taking
this package though. Hope TUs interested in this could help Qianqian
on this.


Sorry for the inconvenience; I'll be back very soon.

Regards,
Shinlun


Obviously "very soon" turned out to be "not so soon", but let's first
wait until he replies himself.


F




Sorry for the inconvenience.
For Tus who can help to update my packages, please just take it.

Though most of my packages are created by myself, I don't have
much time to manage these packages these days for I am focusing
on a different area; I just can not do programming related work
'all day long'.
I would be considering posting resignation notification if there
is no solution to my personal issue next month.

I am still using Arch in my work and private. Really enjoying it.
Thank you guys.

Best regards,
Shinlun
 
Old 04-24-2008, 03:24 PM
"Ray Rashif"
 
Default Shinlun

Shinlun, glad to hear from you - but sad to hear about the situation. Many many thanks for the packages you've made and I hope you can set apart some time for Arch (community) work
 
Old 04-25-2008, 08:09 AM
"Ronald van Haren"
 
Default Shinlun

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Shinlun Hsieh
<shinlun.hsieh@msa.hinet.net> wrote:
> >
> > >
> For Tus who can help to update my packages, please just take it.
>
I will take a look at his outdated packages next week as a quick look
yesterday gave me a couple of compiling issues and I had not much time
to look into it.

I updated to quick fix pcmanx-gtk2 for i686 though, but for x86_64
configure fails on the build machine. Again I did not have many time
to look into it, but maybe someone with a x86_64 machine can take a
look, it may just work or not.

Ronald
 
Old 04-25-2008, 01:27 PM
"Ronald van Haren"
 
Default Shinlun

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Shinlun Hsieh
> <shinlun.hsieh@msa.hinet.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > For Tus who can help to update my packages, please just take it.
> >
> I will take a look at his outdated packages next week as a quick look
> yesterday gave me a couple of compiling issues and I had not much time
> to look into it.
>
> I updated to quick fix pcmanx-gtk2 for i686 though, but for x86_64
> configure fails on the build machine. Again I did not have many time
> to look into it, but maybe someone with a x86_64 machine can take a
> look, it may just work or not.
>
> Ronald
>
BaSh updated a couple of his packages, I did the ones he left, so all
his packages in community are now up2date (except for x86_64 version
of pcmanx-gtk2)
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:35 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org