Please merge gedit-latex-plugin [1] into gedit-latex [2].
gedit-latex-plugin is currently outdated and the maintainer recommends
using the latter package anyways.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:59:36PM -0700, Kevin Vesga wrote:
> Please merge gedit-latex-plugin [1] into gedit-latex [2].
> gedit-latex-plugin is currently outdated and the maintainer recommends
> using the latter package anyways.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13115
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52897
done
08-05-2012, 03:08 PM
Kevin Vesga
Merge package
Please merge spicebird-bin [1] into spicebird [2] as the latter has a
better name.
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please merge spicebird-bin [1] into spicebird [2] as the latter has a
> better name.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14716
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25331
Both packages are unable to download their sources.
--
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
www.seblu.net
08-05-2012, 04:33 PM
Kevin Vesga
Merge package
Sébastien Luttringer <seblu@...> writes:
>
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@...> wrote:
> > Please merge spicebird-bin [1] into spicebird [2] as the latter has a
> > better name.
> >
> > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14716
> > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25331
> Both packages are unable to download their sources.
>
Yes both packages need their PKGBUILDs fixed. But since they're pretty much for
the same program, might as well merge them first.
08-05-2012, 04:43 PM
rafael ff1
Merge package
2012/8/5 Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@gmail.com>:
> Sébastien Luttringer <seblu@...> writes:
>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@...> wrote:
>> > Please merge spicebird-bin [1] into spicebird [2] as the latter has a
>> > better name.
>> >
>> > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14716
>> > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25331
>> Both packages are unable to download their sources.
>>
> Yes both packages need their PKGBUILDs fixed. But since they're pretty much for
> the same program, might as well merge them first.
>
>
May I give my 2 cents on this subject ?
The upstream states in its website's main page that this project is
deprecated and users should use Mozilla Thunderbird. So, I see to
options: 1) remove both, as they might be useless; 2) remove
'spicebird-bin' (as there is no binary available anymore) e fix
'spicebird' to build from source for those want to use it for some
reason.
Personally, I think 1st solution is better.
Rafael Ferreira
08-05-2012, 05:10 PM
Sébastien Luttringer
Merge package
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:43 PM, rafael ff1 <rafael.f.f1@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/8/5 Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@gmail.com>:
>> Sébastien Luttringer <seblu@...> writes:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@...> wrote:
>>> > Please merge spicebird-bin [1] into spicebird [2] as the latter has a
>>> > better name.
>>> >
>>> > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14716
>>> > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25331
>>> Both packages are unable to download their sources.
>>>
>> Yes both packages need their PKGBUILDs fixed. But since they're pretty much for
>> the same program, might as well merge them first.
>>
>>
> May I give my 2 cents on this subject ?
>
> The upstream states in its website's main page that this project is
> deprecated and users should use Mozilla Thunderbird. So, I see to
> options: 1) remove both, as they might be useless; 2) remove
> 'spicebird-bin' (as there is no binary available anymore) e fix
> 'spicebird' to build from source for those want to use it for some
> reason.
>
> Personally, I think 1st solution is better.
Merge package
