Hi guys,

It seems a wxgtk2.9 has landed in community not too long ago, making my
package (wxgtk-2.9 in aur, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31421)
obsolete. However some aur packages depend on it, is it ok to delete it, or
should I wait until everybody has switched their dependencies to the
community package?

Thx in advance.

--
Alucryd

"In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen."

Op maandag 25 juni 2012 10:17:52 schreef Maxime Gauduin:
> Hi guys,
>
> It seems a wxgtk2.9 has landed in community not too long ago, making my
> package (wxgtk-2.9 in aur, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31421)
> obsolete. However some aur packages depend on it, is it ok to delete it, or
> should I wait until everybody has switched their dependencies to the
> community package?
>
> Thx in advance.
>
> --
> Alucryd
>
> "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
> eternal damnation. Amen."

you could leave some comments for the packages depending on wxgtk-2.9 and
state they now should depend on wxgtk2.9. give them some time (a week, two
weeks) and then re-open this thread for deletion or wxgtk-2.9.

you could also opt for direct removal and just leave comments to depend on
wxgtk2.9.

the first is more nice

--Ike

I'll go with the first option then^^ Thx

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Ike Devolder <ike.devolder@gmail.com>wrote:

> Op maandag 25 juni 2012 10:17:52 schreef Maxime Gauduin:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > It seems a wxgtk2.9 has landed in community not too long ago, making my
> > package (wxgtk-2.9 in aur,
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31421)
> > obsolete. However some aur packages depend on it, is it ok to delete it,
> or
> > should I wait until everybody has switched their dependencies to the
> > community package?
> >
> > Thx in advance.
> >
> > --
> > Alucryd
> >
> > "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished
> into
> > eternal damnation. Amen."
>
> you could leave some comments for the packages depending on wxgtk-2.9 and
> state they now should depend on wxgtk2.9. give them some time (a week, two
> weeks) and then re-open this thread for deletion or wxgtk-2.9.
>
> you could also opt for direct removal and just leave comments to depend on
> wxgtk2.9.
>
> the first is more nice
>
> --Ike
>



--
Alucryd

"In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen."

Hey again,

It's been two weeks now that I've notified every package maintainer using
the package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31421, though some
aren't active anymore. Can you delete the package now?

Thx in advance.

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'll go with the first option then^^ Thx
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Ike Devolder <ike.devolder@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Op maandag 25 juni 2012 10:17:52 schreef Maxime Gauduin:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > It seems a wxgtk2.9 has landed in community not too long ago, making my
>> > package (wxgtk-2.9 in aur,
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31421)
>> > obsolete. However some aur packages depend on it, is it ok to delete
>> it, or
>> > should I wait until everybody has switched their dependencies to the
>> > community package?
>> >
>> > Thx in advance.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Alucryd
>> >
>> > "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished
>> into
>> > eternal damnation. Amen."
>>
>> you could leave some comments for the packages depending on wxgtk-2.9 and
>> state they now should depend on wxgtk2.9. give them some time (a week, two
>> weeks) and then re-open this thread for deletion or wxgtk-2.9.
>>
>> you could also opt for direct removal and just leave comments to depend on
>> wxgtk2.9.
>>
>> the first is more nice
>>
>> --Ike
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alucryd
>
> "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished
> into eternal damnation. Amen."
>
>


--
Alucryd

"In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen."

Op maandag 16 juli 2012 00:18:47 schreef Maxime Gauduin:
> Hey again,
>
> It's been two weeks now that I've notified every package maintainer using
> the package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31421, though some
> aren't active anymore. Can you delete the package now?
>
> Thx in advance.
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Maxime Gauduin <alucryd@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'll go with the first option then^^ Thx
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Ike Devolder
<ike.devolder@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> Op maandag 25 juni 2012 10:17:52 schreef Maxime Gauduin:
> >> > Hi guys,
> >> >
> >> > It seems a wxgtk2.9 has landed in community not too long ago, making my
> >> > package (wxgtk-2.9 in aur,
> >>
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31421)
> >>
> >> > obsolete. However some aur packages depend on it, is it ok to delete
> >>
> >> it, or
> >>
> >> > should I wait until everybody has switched their dependencies to the
> >> > community package?
> >> >
> >> > Thx in advance.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Alucryd
> >> >
> >> > "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished
> >>
> >> into
> >>
> >> > eternal damnation. Amen."
> >>
> >> you could leave some comments for the packages depending on wxgtk-2.9 and
> >> state they now should depend on wxgtk2.9. give them some time (a week,
> >> two
> >> weeks) and then re-open this thread for deletion or wxgtk-2.9.
> >>
> >> you could also opt for direct removal and just leave comments to depend
> >> on
> >> wxgtk2.9.
> >>
> >> the first is more nice
> >>
> >> --Ike
> >
> > --
> > Alucryd
> >
> > "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished
> > into eternal damnation. Amen."

removed, thx

--Ike