Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable
On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
> In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should
> be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There
> probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues.
Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes
later tlm uploaded the new one.
We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.
[1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02
+0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481
Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable
Maandag 28 Mei 2012 om 21:41 (CEST +0200) schreef Andrea Scarpino:
On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should
be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There
probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues.
Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes
later tlm uploaded the new one.
We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.
[1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02
+0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481
I agree, the older package is version 7.0.9348-1, the newer one by tlm
is 7.0.9350-3, which is just slightly newer.
--
Christian Stadegaart
05-29-2012, 01:03 AM
José Valecillos
Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable
Is stupid, he is just eagerness for take over the package. I use
teamviewer and the current maintainer update the package very often
(more than I'd like).
2012/5/28 Christian Stadegaart <e-mail@bewust-leven.nl>:
> Maandag 28 Mei 2012 om 21:41 (CEST +0200) schreef Andrea Scarpino:
>
>
>> On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
>>>
>>> In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should
>>> be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There
>>> probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues.
>>
>> Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes
>> later tlm uploaded the new one.
>> We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.
>>
>> [1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02
>> +0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481
>>
>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59577
>>
> I agree, the older package is version 7.0.9348-1, the newer one by tlm is
> 7.0.9350-3, which is just slightly newer.
>
> --
> Christian Stadegaart
>
--
"La envidia es causada por ver a otro gozar de lo que deseamos; los
celos, por ver a otro poseer lo que quisiéramos poseer nosotros".
Diógenes Laercio (S. III AC-?) Historiador griego.
05-29-2012, 02:30 AM
Federico Cinelli
Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable
Have you guys been in touch with him yet? I'm sure someone else will
gladly take over the package if he's no longer interested
Is stupid, he is just eagerness for take over the package. I use
teamviewer and the current maintainer update the package very often
(more than I'd like).
2012/5/28 Christian Stadegaart<e-mail@bewust-leven.nl>:
Maandag 28 Mei 2012 om 21:41 (CEST +0200) schreef Andrea Scarpino:
On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should
be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There
probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues.
Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes
later tlm uploaded the new one.
We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.
[1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02
+0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481
Is stupid, he is just eagerness for take over the package. I use
teamviewer and the current maintainer update the package very often
(more than I'd like).
2012/5/28 Christian Stadegaart <e-mail@bewust-leven.nl>:
Maandag 28 Mei 2012 om 21:41 (CEST +0200) schreef Andrea Scarpino:
On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package
should
be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There
probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues.
Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20
minutes
later tlm uploaded the new one.
We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.
[1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012
13:34:02
I agree, the older package is version 7.0.9348-1, the newer one by
tlm is
7.0.9350-3, which is just slightly newer.
--
Christian Stadegaart
Guys / gals,
Can someone with administrative power either merge these two packages or
delete tlm's package instead? These two packages will confuse (new)
AUR/Teamviewer users and Hilinus' package was always and is updated just
fine.
Thanks!
--
Christian Stadegaart
05-31-2012, 08:45 PM
Seblu
Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Christian Stadegaart
<e-mail@bewust-leven.nl> wrote:
> I noticed that tlm created teamviewer-stable package since, in his opinion
> Hilinus, the current maintainer of Teamviewer isn't doing a good job.
>
I removed tlm package. Everyone seems happy with the current maintainer.
--
Sébastien Luttringer
www.seblu.net
05-31-2012, 08:45 PM
Seblu
Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Christian Stadegaart
<e-mail@bewust-leven.nl> wrote:
> I noticed that tlm created teamviewer-stable package since, in his opinion
> Hilinus, the current maintainer of Teamviewer isn't doing a good job.
>
I removed tlm package. Everyone seems happy with the current maintainer.
--
Sébastien Luttringer
www.seblu.net
05-31-2012, 10:53 PM
Christian Stadegaart
Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable
Donderdag 31 Mei 2012 om 22:45 (CEST +0200) schreef Seblu:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Christian Stadegaart
<e-mail@bewust-leven.nl> wrote:
I noticed that tlm created teamviewer-stable package since, in his opinion
Hilinus, the current maintainer of Teamviewer isn't doing a good job.
I removed tlm package. Everyone seems happy with the current maintainer.
Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable
