On 2011?09?07? 10:33, Heiko Baums wrote:

Am Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:02:53 +0800
schrieb Jekyll Wu<adaptee@gmail.com>:


ttf-ubuntu-font-family[1] and ttf-ubuntu[2] are essentially the same,
except that the latter provides an outdated version.

Please merge [2] into [1].

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41465
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47336

Wouldn't it be better to merge [1] into [2] due to a better naming
scheme?

Heiko
I am not sure which name is better, but I think this comment from [1]
might help:


Comment by: mtorromeo on Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:52:56 +0000

@schivmeister: the upstream project is named "ubuntu font family"
and ttf-ubuntu-font-family is also the package name in ubuntu.

On 7 September 2011 10:02, Jekyll Wu <adaptee@gmail.com> wrote:
> ttf-ubuntu-font-family[1] and ttf-ubuntu[2] are essentially the same, except
> that the latter provides an outdated version.
>
> Please merge [2] into [1].
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41465
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47336

I think the older version is better according to some users so it remained.


--
GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10