Flash 10.1 and kernel26 packages
By the looks of it both flashplugins are used by devs for testing their
flash apps on older versions of flash. Neither are considered popular but
both have a use so I vote that they should stay.
As for the kernel26 packages I don't know how it worked in the past with
kernel24 packages but I think a month after the movement of linux from
testing to core seems a reasonable amount of time before deleting them.
Ultimately it's up to the TU's though.
Gadget3000
On 15 August 2011 15:52, Det <nimetonmaili@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12.8.2011 19:12, Det wrote:
>
>> Hi all you electronic mail readers,
>>
>> There was some talk some time ago I think concerning the removal of the
>> Flash10.1 packages. I thought I'd bring it back up. Here are the links:
>>
>> flashplugin-10.1: http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=47029<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47029>
>> lib32-flashplugin10.1: http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=49982<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49982>
>>
>> Then another thing is those kernel26- packages (all 59 of 'em). Is there
>> some deadline until all the ones that hasn't been updated or converted into
>> linux- alternatives should be removed?:
>>
>> http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?K=kernel26&SeB=n&**PP=100<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=kernel26&SeB=n&PP=100>
>>
>> Thanks, byyye
>> Det
>>
>> End of electronic guru mail.
>>
> This is a tricky one I know. What about just the Flash10.1 packages?
>
>
|
