On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Uli Armbruster
> * Uli Armbruster <email@example.com> [22.06.2011 13:33]:
>> * Heiko Baums <firstname.lastname@example.org> [22.06.2011 13:22]:
>> > Am Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:04 +0200
>> > schrieb Uli Armbruster <email@example.com>:
>> > > Here's the link https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49992
>> > > I reuploaded under the name mkvmerge-gui because the name fits better
>> > > (I also added mmg and mkvtoolnix to the description, so it can be
>> > > found as good as possible)
>> > >
>> > > And here's the link to mkvtoolnix-nogui
>> > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41546 This isn't needed
>> > > anymore, because repo's mkvtoolnix removed the mkvmerge-gui mmg. A
>> > > package called eunektes requires this version, but I informed the
>> > > maintainer in the comment section to adjust the dependency.
>> > >
>> > > Merci beaucoup
>> > Isn't it better to call the packages mkvmerge-gtk and mkvmerge-cli?
>> > It's the usual naming convention in the repos and in AUR.
>> > Heiko
>> Well, I could do that too, you're right. In my opinion *-gui is fine, because .. well it IS the gui of mkvmerge
And most importantly, I named it that way, because the real name of mmg is "mkvmerge GUI", so I had the choice between "mkvmergegui" or "mkvmerge-gui". I chose the latter, because it looks better
>> But honestly, I don't care, if it's called *-gui or *-gtk. If it's really convention (I haven't found this anywhere after a quick search like in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Package_Naming) or if TUs thing *-gtk is better, I'll be happy to reupload it with that name.
> Just remembered, this package is still there. Could anyone please delete it? Or make me TU for a day and I'll do it myself
Done. Both pkg deleted.