We have four packages:
aegisub [1] - this pulls from svn, from the 2.1.9 branch (2.1.9 will
be the next stable version)
aegisub-stable [2] - this compiles the stable version from the
released tarball - 2.1.8 at the moment, which is quite old and probably
doesn't build anymore due to changes in ffmpeg
aegisub-bin [3] - this repackages the binary from upstream, stable
version
aegisub-svn [4] - this builds from svn, from trunk (trunk should
become version 3.0, when it's ready)
[1] should be renamed 'aegisub-next-svn' or something like that, and [2]
should be renamed simply 'aegisub'
Don't you agree?
Ccing the maintainer of [1].
Sidenote: I'll probably update [2] once 2.1.9 is released (should be
soon enough).
In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> We have four packages:
> aegisub [1] - this pulls from svn, from the 2.1.9 branch (2.1.9 will
> be the next stable version)
> aegisub-stable [2] - this compiles the stable version from the
> released tarball - 2.1.8 at the moment, which is quite old and probably
> doesn't build anymore due to changes in ffmpeg
> aegisub-bin [3] - this repackages the binary from upstream, stable
> version
> aegisub-svn [4] - this builds from svn, from trunk (trunk should
> become version 3.0, when it's ready)
>
> [1] should be renamed 'aegisub-next-svn' or something like that, and [2]
> should be renamed simply 'aegisub'
Agreed. But i'm not too practical with the AUR and i don't know how to
rename a package. Maybe i could create another one with the name you
suggest and then let some admin delete the old aegisub package. But what
happens to users who have installed it? Should I use replaces=() in the
PKGBUILD?
06-20-2011, 11:37 PM
Stefan Husmann
Naming of aegisub packages
Am 19.06.2011 10:07, schrieb Hilinus Fenfort:
In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
Hello,
We have four packages:
aegisub [1] - this pulls from svn, from the 2.1.9 branch (2.1.9 will
be the next stable version)
aegisub-stable [2] - this compiles the stable version from the
released tarball - 2.1.8 at the moment, which is quite old and probably
doesn't build anymore due to changes in ffmpeg
aegisub-bin [3] - this repackages the binary from upstream, stable
version
aegisub-svn [4] - this builds from svn, from trunk (trunk should
become version 3.0, when it's ready)
[1] should be renamed 'aegisub-next-svn' or something like that, and [2]
should be renamed simply 'aegisub'
Agreed. But i'm not too practical with the AUR and i don't know how to
rename a package. Maybe i could create another one with the name you
suggest and then let some admin delete the old aegisub package. But what
happens to users who have installed it? Should I use replaces=() in the
PKGBUILD?
Renaming is not possible yet. Indeed the only working way is to create a
new package under another name. I do not like the name 'aegisub-next-svn'
that much, because IMHO it is not clear enough. I would prefer
'aegisub-stable-svn'.
Do not use 'replaces=()' here. Use provides=('aegisub') and conflicts=('aegisub').
Keep contributing!
Regards Stefan
06-21-2011, 08:36 AM
cantabile
Naming of aegisub packages
On 06/21/2011 02:37 AM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
I do not like the name 'aegisub-next-svn'
that much, because IMHO it is not clear enough. I would prefer
'aegisub-stable-svn'.
I guess that could work.
--
cantabile
"Jayne is a girl's name." -- River
06-25-2011, 12:30 PM
Hilinus Fenfort
Naming of aegisub packages
In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> We have four packages:
> aegisub [1] - this pulls from svn, from the 2.1.9 branch (2.1.9 will
> be the next stable version)
> aegisub-stable [2] - this compiles the stable version from the
In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
> Renaming is not possible yet. Indeed the only working way is to create a
> new package under another name. I do not like the name 'aegisub-next-
svn'
> that much, because IMHO it is not clear enough. I would prefer
> 'aegisub-stable-svn'.
>
> Do not use 'replaces=()' here. Use provides=('aegisub') and
conflicts=('aegisub').
>
> Keep contributing!
>
> Regards Stefan
I have created another package named "aegisub-stable-svn". Someone should
delete the old one now. Should i open a deletion request or can i ask in this
thread?
Thanks,
Hilinus
06-25-2011, 05:48 PM
cantabile
Naming of aegisub packages
On 06/25/2011 03:30 PM, Hilinus Fenfort wrote:
In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
Hello,
We have four packages:
aegisub [1] - this pulls from svn, from the 2.1.9 branch (2.1.9 will
be the next stable version)
aegisub-stable [2] - this compiles the stable version from the
In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
Renaming is not possible yet. Indeed the only working way is to create a
new package under another name. I do not like the name 'aegisub-next-
svn'
that much, because IMHO it is not clear enough. I would prefer
'aegisub-stable-svn'.
Do not use 'replaces=()' here. Use provides=('aegisub') and
conflicts=('aegisub').
Keep contributing!
Regards Stefan
I have created another package named "aegisub-stable-svn". Someone should
delete the old one now. Should i open a deletion request or can i ask in this
thread?
Thanks,
Hilinus
It's on topic, so it should be fine here.
Please delete aegisub-stable [1] as well, I will upload a new package
named "aegisub" when they release 2.1.9.
In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
Hello,
We have four packages:
aegisub [1] - this pulls from svn, from the 2.1.9 branch (2.1.9 will
be the next stable version)
aegisub-stable [2] - this compiles the stable version from the
In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
Renaming is not possible yet. Indeed the only working way is to create a
new package under another name. I do not like the name 'aegisub-next-
svn'
that much, because IMHO it is not clear enough. I would prefer
'aegisub-stable-svn'.
Do not use 'replaces=()' here. Use provides=('aegisub') and
conflicts=('aegisub').
Keep contributing!
Regards Stefan
I have created another package named "aegisub-stable-svn". Someone should
delete the old one now. Should i open a deletion request or can i ask in this
thread?
Thanks,
Hilinus
It's on topic, so it should be fine here.
Please delete aegisub-stable [1] as well, I will upload a new package named "aegisub" when they release 2.1.9.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40870 deleted. Before I mix something up: Which was the other one to delete?
Stefan
06-25-2011, 07:52 PM
cantabile
Naming of aegisub packages
On 06/25/2011 09:15 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 25.06.2011 19:48, schrieb cantabile:
On 06/25/2011 03:30 PM, Hilinus Fenfort wrote:
In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
Hello,
We have four packages:
aegisub [1] - this pulls from svn, from the 2.1.9 branch (2.1.9 will
be the next stable version)
aegisub-stable [2] - this compiles the stable version from the
In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
Renaming is not possible yet. Indeed the only working way is to
create a
new package under another name. I do not like the name 'aegisub-next-
svn'
that much, because IMHO it is not clear enough. I would prefer
'aegisub-stable-svn'.
Do not use 'replaces=()' here. Use provides=('aegisub') and
conflicts=('aegisub').
Keep contributing!
Regards Stefan
I have created another package named "aegisub-stable-svn". Someone
should
delete the old one now. Should i open a deletion request or can i ask
in this
thread?
Thanks,
Hilinus
It's on topic, so it should be fine here.
Please delete aegisub-stable [1] as well, I will upload a new package
named "aegisub" when they release 2.1.9.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40870 deleted. Before I mix
something up: Which was the other one to delete?
Stefan
Technically, "aegisub-stable" was the only one that needed to be
deleted, but someone already deleted "aegisub".
--
cantabile
"Jayne is a girl's name." -- River
06-25-2011, 08:11 PM
Andrea Scarpino
Naming of aegisub packages
On Saturday 25 June 2011 22:52:23 cantabile wrote:
> Technically, "aegisub-stable" was the only one that needed to be
> deleted, but someone already deleted "aegisub".
I did. I received a private message from Hilinus.
--
Andrea
06-25-2011, 08:31 PM
Hilinus Fenfort
Naming of aegisub packages
In data sabato 25 giugno 2011 22:52:23, cantabile ha scritto:
> On 06/25/2011 09:15 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> > Am 25.06.2011 19:48, schrieb cantabile:
> >> On 06/25/2011 03:30 PM, Hilinus Fenfort wrote:
> >>> In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> We have four packages:
> >>>> aegisub [1] - this pulls from svn, from the 2.1.9 branch (2.1.9
> >>>> will
> >>>> be the next stable version)
> >>>> aegisub-stable [2] - this compiles the stable version from the
> >>>
> >>> In data domenica 19 giugno 2011 10:14:14, cantabile ha scritto:
> >>>> Renaming is not possible yet. Indeed the only working way is to
> >>>> create a
> >>>> new package under another name. I do not like the name
> >>>> 'aegisub-next-
> >>>
> >>> svn'
> >>>
> >>>> that much, because IMHO it is not clear enough. I would prefer
> >>>> 'aegisub-stable-svn'.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do not use 'replaces=()' here. Use provides=('aegisub') and
> >>>
> >>> conflicts=('aegisub').
> >>>
> >>>> Keep contributing!
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards Stefan
> >>>
> >>> I have created another package named "aegisub-stable-svn". Someone
> >>> should
> >>> delete the old one now. Should i open a deletion request or can i
> >>> ask
> >>> in this
> >>> thread?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Hilinus
> >>
> >> It's on topic, so it should be fine here.
> >>
> >> Please delete aegisub-stable [1] as well, I will upload a new package
> >> named "aegisub" when they release 2.1.9.
> >>
> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40870
> >
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40870 deleted. Before I mix
> > something up: Which was the other one to delete?
> >
> > Stefan
>
> Technically, "aegisub-stable" was the only one that needed to be
> deleted, but someone already deleted "aegisub".
Should we delete "aegisub-svn" too? In this way, we will have:
[1] "aegisub-bin" which refers to the old (precompiled) stable version
[2] "aegisub-stable-svn" which refers to the next stable version
When 2.1.9 comes out, we could just update the "aegisub-bin" package with
prebuilt binaries, if they will be put out by devs. Regarding the "aegisub"
package, how are you going to proceed? It will build 2.1.9 from sources?