FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > ArchLinux > ArchLinux User Repository

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:07 PM
Huub Munstege
 
Default Community Cleanup 2011.

Hi,

no nothing, forget it.
Just wanted to send a mail to Thomas directly.
Saw afterwards it went to aur-general@archlinux.org.
Sorry again.

best regards

________________________________
Huub Munstege
BPE 2836
Bamako, Rep. du Mali
Tel: +223 20226397
Port: +223 78370695
________________________________





________________________________
From: Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org>
To: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) <aur-general@archlinux.org>
Sent: Mon, January 10, 2011 7:38:00 PM
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011.

On Monday 10 January 2011 11:26:00 Huub Munstege wrote:
> This is more of a assigning responsibility to a package sort of thing,
> as I said, I would rather have it be in aur and have a maintainer then
> be in community and be an orphan.
Grass is maintained by Thomas and you already reported your problem on flyspray
(FS#22379). So tell me what's the goal of this off topic.

--
Andrea

Insert mode
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:40 PM
Thomas Dziedzic
 
Default Community Cleanup 2011.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@gjcp.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 09:49 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org> wrote:
>> > On Monday 10 January 2011 15:41:23 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>> >> Can you provide a final list? I did this job some months ago and I don't
>> >> think that we have more orphans packages which can be moved.
>> > Here[1] my previous list (you can edit the page and use it)
>> >
>> > [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Community_Repo_Cleanup
>> >
>>
>> I have edited the link [1] I am proposing this as more of an ultimatum
>> to have 0 orphans by the end of this week.
>>
>> @gordonjcp
>> "python-pyparallel - will adopt, Gordonjcp" still on the list...
>>
>> [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Community_Repo_Cleanup#Packages_to_m ove_to_Unsupported
>>
>
> What do I need to do, then? *I thought the idea was it would drop back
> into AUR where I could pick it up?

It is up to you, either adopt it in community or it will go into the
aur this time :P

>
> Gordon MM0YEQ
>
>
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:41 PM
Thomas Dziedzic
 
Default Community Cleanup 2011.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@gjcp.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 09:49 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>> > On Monday 10 January 2011 15:41:23 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>>> >> Can you provide a final list? I did this job some months ago and I don't
>>> >> think that we have more orphans packages which can be moved.
>>> > Here[1] my previous list (you can edit the page and use it)
>>> >
>>> > [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Community_Repo_Cleanup
>>> >
>>>
>>> I have edited the link [1] I am proposing this as more of an ultimatum
>>> to have 0 orphans by the end of this week.
>>>
>>> @gordonjcp
>>> "python-pyparallel - will adopt, Gordonjcp" still on the list...
>>>
>>> [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Community_Repo_Cleanup#Packages_to_m ove_to_Unsupported
>>>
>>
>> What do I need to do, then? *I thought the idea was it would drop back
>> into AUR where I could pick it up?
>
> It is up to you, either adopt it in community or it will go into the
> aur this time :P
>
>>
>> Gordon MM0YEQ
>>
>>
>

Note, I don't want to single you out, any tu can adopt it, the point
is it having a maintainer.
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:49 PM
Gordon JC Pearce
 
Default Community Cleanup 2011.

On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:41 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:

>
> Note, I don't want to single you out, any tu can adopt it, the point
> is it having a maintainer.
>

I'm not a TU so presumably I can't adopt it in community?
Errm... I can't figure out how to adopt it in community, either. Maybe
I should leave community alone for now...

Gordon MM0YEQ
 
Old 01-10-2011, 07:53 PM
Thomas Dziedzic
 
Default Community Cleanup 2011.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@gjcp.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:41 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>
>>
>> Note, I don't want to single you out, any tu can adopt it, the point
>> is it having a maintainer.
>>
>
> I'm not a TU so presumably I can't adopt it in community?
> Errm... I can't figure out how to adopt it in community, either. *Maybe
> I should leave community alone for now...
>
> Gordon MM0YEQ
>
>

Oh... I think the previous discussion was confused when you said you
would adopt it since they probably thought you were a tu and left it
in community In that case, you don't have to do anything, just wait
until the end of the week if no one wants to maintain it, though I
would rather have you maintain it since you seem to be interested in
the package.
 
Old 01-11-2011, 09:57 AM
Lukas Fleischer
 
Default Community Cleanup 2011.

Adopted fcgiwrap and spawn-fcgi.
 
Old 01-13-2011, 12:12 AM
Thomas Dziedzic
 
Default Community Cleanup 2011.

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Lukas Fleischer
<archlinux@cryptocrack.de> wrote:
> Adopted fcgiwrap and spawn-fcgi.
>

54 orphans left. Please try to see if any of your packages depend on
an orphan and adopt them, I see plenty of those.
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:58 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org