On 12/12/10 13:26, Marc Cousin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you orphan ri-li ? It's not maintained for 2 years, and can't be built.
> I've re-made the patch and package, and can upload it.

The package's maintainer updated another package on Dec 8, so he's still
active. I'm Cc'ing him so he's aware of the issue.

If he doesn't respond or update the package in a week, I'll orphan it
for you on Monday, Dec 20. You might also want to post a link to your
patch or package in the comments, for the current maintainer to use.

Le dimanche 12 décembre 2010 13:44:02, Evangelos Foutras a écrit :
> On 12/12/10 13:26, Marc Cousin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could you orphan ri-li ? It's not maintained for 2 years, and can't be
> > built. I've re-made the patch and package, and can upload it.
>
> The package's maintainer updated another package on Dec 8, so he's still
> active. I'm Cc'ing him so he's aware of the issue.
>
> If he doesn't respond or update the package in a week, I'll orphan it
> for you on Monday, Dec 20. You might also want to post a link to your
> patch or package in the comments, for the current maintainer to use.

Sorry, I don't get it.

On aur's web interface, I get last update :31 may 2008.

What did I miss ?

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I don't get it.
>
> On aur's web interface, I get last update :31 may 2008.
>
> What did I miss ?

The same person also maintains stratagus [1], which was lastly updated
on Dec 8 2010. This means that he's active and can either fix the
package in question (ri-li) or disown it in case he doesn't want to
maintain it anymore.


[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=858

Le dimanche 12 décembre 2010 13:59:32, Evangelos Foutras a écrit :
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't get it.
> >
> > On aur's web interface, I get last update :31 may 2008.
> >
> > What did I miss ?
>
> The same person also maintains stratagus [1], which was lastly updated
> on Dec 8 2010. This means that he's active and can either fix the
> package in question (ri-li) or disown it in case he doesn't want to
> maintain it anymore.
>
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=858

Ok. Sorry, sunday morning, not really awake. ANOTHER package

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com> wrote:
> The same person also maintains stratagus [1], which was lastly updated
> on Dec 8 2010. This means that he's active and can either fix the
> package in question (ri-li) or disown it in case he doesn't want to
> maintain it anymore.

Yes, I'm alive and active, and I can either fix (if Marc sends me the
new patch) or disown the package.
Let me know what road to take.

Regards,
Angelo Theodorou

The Sunday 12 December 2010 23:03:44, Angelo "Encelo" Theodorou wrote :
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > The same person also maintains stratagus [1], which was lastly updated
> > on Dec 8 2010. This means that he's active and can either fix the
> > package in question (ri-li) or disown it in case he doesn't want to
> > maintain it anymore.
>
> Yes, I'm alive and active, and I can either fix (if Marc sends me the
> new patch) or disown the package.
> Let me know what road to take.

Patch sent.