TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Discussion Period
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Ray Rashif <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 12 December 2010 11:39, Loui Chang <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
>>> The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the TU
>>> The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. Briefly,
>>> these include:
>>> * enabling a vote to pass in the absence of quorum when more than 50% of active
>>> * TUs have voted YES
>>> * enabling a vote to fail in the absence of quorum when 50% or more of active
>>> * TUs have voted NO
>>> * clarifying the text to eliminate ambiguities
>>> Please see Kaiting's "[aur-general]Amendment" thread and Loui's
>>> "[aur-general][PATCH]tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure" thread for
>>> more details.
>>> This message marks the beginning of the 5-day discussion period before the
>>> amendment is put to a vote.
>> Can we get that as a patch so I may apply it to the hosted version if
>> the vote passes? The content should probably be on the mailing list as
> We can compare-and-contrast better looking at a patch, so +1 to that.
yes, please provide a patch.