Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > Don't get me wrong, I wasn't accusing you or your package of anything. Not
> > > sure what happened except those problems that came out of no where.
> > Don't worry, I didn't take it that way at all. I just wanted to clarify for
> > anyone else following the thread so they don't walk away thinking that
> > arch32-light might be dangerous.
> But arch32-light ate my babies =)
Hey, that's by design. Why do you think it's called "-light"? If you want to
enjoy the act of procreation *and* the progeny it engenders, then you should
use the non-light package. :P