Currently i maintain lib32-glib, but since the multilib repo is here the
awesome dev's already packaged it .

AUR link http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15540
Package link http://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/lib32-glibc/

Btw. thank you dev's for the effort of brining in a multilib repo!


--
Jelle van der Waa

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
> Currently i maintain lib32-glib, but since the multilib repo is here the
> awesome dev's already packaged it .
>
> AUR link http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15540
> Package link http://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/lib32-glibc/
>
> Btw. thank you dev's for the effort of brining in a multilib repo!
>
>
> --
> Jelle van der Waa

Done.

On 08/31/2010 01:23 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:

Currently i maintain lib32-glib, but since the multilib repo is here the
awesome dev's already packaged it .

AUR link http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15540
Package link http://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/lib32-glibc/

Btw. thank you dev's for the effort of brining in a multilib repo!




the two mentioned are totally different and have other purpose.

lib32-glib vs lib32-glibc.

--
IonuÈ›

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 08/31/2010 01:23 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>>
>> Currently i maintain lib32-glib, but since the multilib repo is here the
>> awesome dev's already packaged it .
>>
>> AUR link http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15540
>> Package link
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/lib32-glibc/
>>
>> Btw. thank you dev's for the effort of brining in a multilib repo!
>>
>>
>
> the two mentioned are totally different and have other purpose.
>
> lib32-glib vs lib32-glibc.
>
> --
> IonuÈ›

Hmmm, true. I should have checked the names more carefully before deleting it.

Anyways, reuploaded as http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40410.