Delete fmod?
 

On 18/07/2010, Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:
> The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103)
> currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and
> upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version,
> fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it).
> It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or
> should it be left there?

Delete it.


--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

Delete fmod?
 

On 07/18/2010 12:26 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:

On 18/07/2010, Sven-Hendrik Haase<sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:

The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103)
currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and
upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version,
fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it).
It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or
should it be left there?


Delete it.



+1

--
IonuÈ›

Delete fmod?
 

+2

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 07/18/2010 12:26 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>
>> On 18/07/2010, Sven-Hendrik Haase<sh@lutzhaase.com> Â*wrote:
>>>
>>> Â*The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103)
>>> currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and
>>> upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version,
>>> fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it).
>>> It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or
>>> should it be left there?
>>
>> Delete it.
>>
>
> +1
>
> --
> IonuÈ›
>

Delete fmod?
 

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jan Steffens <jan.steffens@gmail.com> wrote:
> +2
>
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
>> On 07/18/2010 12:26 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18/07/2010, Sven-Hendrik Haase<sh@lutzhaase.com> Â*wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Â*The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103)
>>>> currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and
>>>> upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version,
>>>> fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it).
>>>> It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or
>>>> should it be left there?
>>>
>>> Delete it.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> --
>> IonuÈ›
>>
>
+1

Delete fmod?
 

On 18.07.2010 02:18, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jan Steffens <jan.steffens@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +2
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2010 12:26 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>>> On 18/07/2010, Sven-Hendrik Haase<sh@lutzhaase.com> wrote:
>>>>> The fmod package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=103)
>>>>> currently does not have any Google-accessible package source and
>>>>> upstream support for it has long been stopped. Its newer version,
>>>>> fmodex, is in community (yes, we do have permission to redistribute it).
>>>>> It thus doesn't build anymore. Should such a package be deleted or
>>>>> should it be left there?
>>>> Delete it.
>>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> --
>>> IonuÈ›
>>>
> +1
>
Deleted.