I would like to know the real reason too, you don't seem like the owner
of the package and it seems actively maintained.
--
Jelle van der Waa
07-22-2011, 03:23 PM
Cédric Girard
Delete request
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
> On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, cantabile wrote:
>
>> On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote:
>>
>>> virtualbox-guest-modules-ck
>>>
>>> http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=49288<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49288>
>>>
>> Why?
>>
>> I would like to know the real reason too, you don't seem like the owner
> of the package and it seems actively maintained.
>
>
It does not prevent him from giving a reason but he does seems to be the
maintainer and the package has seen no update since its creation.
--
Cédric Girard
07-22-2011, 03:51 PM
Jelle van der Waa
Delete request
On 07/22/2011 05:23 PM, Cédric Girard wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jelle van der Waa<jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I would like to know the real reason too, you don't seem like the owner
of the package and it seems actively maintained.
It does not prevent him from giving a reason but he does seems to be the
maintainer and the package has seen no update since its creation.
ohwait, i clicked the wrong link, he is the maintainer.
--
Jelle van der Waa
07-22-2011, 05:55 PM
member graysky
Delete request
Sorry, this PKGBUILD is not right (too inefficient) and I would rather
wait for the new linux-ck naming scheme to work on it. I can reupload
the renamed version later on.
2011/7/22 Cédric Girard <girard.cedric@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
>
>> On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, cantabile wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote:
>>>
>>>> virtualbox-guest-modules-ck
>>>>
>>>> http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=49288<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49288>
>>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> *I would like to know the real reason too, you don't seem like the owner
>> of the package and it seems actively maintained.
>>
>>
> It does not prevent him from giving a reason but he does seems to be the
> maintainer and the package has seen no update since its creation.
>
> --
> Cédric Girard
>
Fri Jul 22 21:30:01 2011
Return-path: <ubuntu-users-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:56:37 +0300
Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]:46473)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <ubuntu-users-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com>)
id 1QkJxl-00015J-Er
for tom@linux-archive.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:56:37 +0300
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com)
by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <ubuntu-users-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com>)
id 1QkJzS-0003t1-5q; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:58:22 +0000
Received: from mail-gw0-f49.google.com ([74.125.83.49])
by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from <toshazed@gmail.com>) id 1QkJzP-0003sR-8O
for ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:58:19 +0000
Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so2656074gwb.8
for <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>;
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=KysiLy9PpIvZ1CV32R4xmgKFH7eOryqcJwSdAWcvw3Y=;
b=bvOJX57oAK6zY53GA04j2S0ZbWfhChgWOt+rDkxUkQ+QYuM0 lP185Qx2NKKVm43a3D
hHzgO2Iay1R5wIg2GSAf3V0OUH2HR55A/37NaymuLBFSUHzEk4QQmPtlVGtkrJISYOU3
3pY7DkSmxI+2mT/0dcCN5+ldtbhj3SF1yTwskMIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.138.229 with SMTP id a65mr2755435yhj.14.1311357498572;
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.103.11 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANfxArN0hBtiLUmSF=ZRjdtJkXhKQggWT=cM_QOmt-mVpzbgyA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANfxArN0hBtiLUmSF=ZRjdtJkXhKQggWT=cM_QOmt-mVpzbgyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 23:58:17 +0600
Message-ID: <CAK6e52r2vrrRJ1k5QnEwGU-W9y1Yac5pKXvaT3Pg_tmZpbe-4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ubuntu Package Operation failed.
From: =?UTF-8?B?4Ka44Ka+4Kac4KeH4Kam4KeB4KawIOCmsOCmueCmv+Cmri Dgppzgp4vgp5/gpr7gprDgpqY=? =?UTF-8?B?4Ka+4Kaw?= <toshazed@gmail.com>
To: "Ubuntu user technical support,
not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
X-BeenThere: ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Ubuntu user technical support,
not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
List-Id: "Ubuntu user technical support,
not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users.lists.ubuntu.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/options/ubuntu-users>,
<mailto:ubuntu-users-request@lists.ubuntu.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ubuntu-users-request@lists.ubuntu.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users>,
<mailto:ubuntu-users-request@lists.ubuntu.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="==============)40646313731478010=="
Sender: ubuntu-users-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com
Errors-To: ubuntu-users-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
--==============)40646313731478010==--
07-24-2011, 04:35 PM
Lukáš Jirkovský
Delete request
On 22 July 2011 19:55, member graysky <graysky@archlinux.us> wrote:
> Sorry, this PKGBUILD is not right (too inefficient) and I would rather
> wait for the new linux-ck naming scheme to work on it. Â*I can reupload
> the renamed version later on.
>
OK, removed
07-26-2011, 07:36 PM
speps
Delete Request
Hi, please delete all useless audacious2* packages,
they're all orphaned:
Please do not touch audacious2{,-plugins} since
they provide a gtk2 version of the audacious{,-plugins}
in extra, that does not conflict with the gtk3 one.
[2011-07-26 21:36:07 +0200] speps:
> Please do not touch audacious2{,-plugins} since
> they provide a gtk2 version of the audacious{,-plugins}
> in extra, that does not conflict with the gtk3 one.
My two cents: audacious2 makes it seem like it is version 2.* of
audacious; I would name the package audacious-gtk2 instead.
--
Gaetan
07-27-2011, 12:11 AM
Auguste Pop
Delete Request
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Gaetan Bisson <bisson@archlinux.org> wrote:
> [2011-07-26 21:36:07 +0200] speps:
>> Please do not touch audacious2{,-plugins} since
>> they provide a gtk2 version of the audacious{,-plugins}
>> in extra, that does not conflict with the gtk3 one.
>
> My two cents: audacious2 makes it seem like it is version 2.* of
> audacious; I would name the package audacious-gtk2 instead.
>
> --
> Gaetan
>
quite agree. i created an audacious-gtk2 package several days ago
without the knowledge that audacious2 was there which meant to provide
audacious compiled against gtk2.
07-27-2011, 02:40 AM
Gaetan Bisson
Delete Request
[2011-07-27 08:11:52 +0800] Auguste Pop:
> audacious2 was there
Delete request
