Hi TUs,
I want to see who is working and who is not.
These TUs are flagged as active but they did nothing in the last 4-6 months.
What do you think about? Should we start with removal vote?
Kessia Pinheiro aka even:
- last package sent on 20th March '09
- last closed bug on 13th April '09
- last post on bbs 18th April '09
Aaron Schaefer aka elasticdog:
- last package sent on 14th June '09
- last closed bug on 22th April '09
- last post on bbs 19th March '09
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
10-31-2009, 09:14 PM
Laszlo Papp
even and elasticdog status?
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Hi TUs,
> I want to see who is working and who is not.
> These TUs are flagged as active but they did nothing in the last 4-6 months.
> What do you think about? Should we start with removal vote?
>
> Kessia Pinheiro aka even:
> - last package sent on 20th March '09
> - last closed bug on 13th April '09
> - last post on bbs 18th April '09
>
> Aaron Schaefer aka elasticdog:
> - last package sent on 14th June '09
> - last closed bug on 22th April '09
> - last post on bbs 19th March '09
>
> --
> Andrea `bash` Scarpino
> Arch Linux Developer
>
Sorry Andrea, I'm not a TU but as I know, Kessia did some activity,
orphaning packages e.g. since then.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
10-31-2009, 10:48 PM
Loui Chang
even and elasticdog status?
On Sat 31 Oct 2009 23:11 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> Hi TUs,
> I want to see who is working and who is not.
> These TUs are flagged as active but they did nothing in the last 4-6 months.
> What do you think about? Should we start with removal vote?
>
> Kessia Pinheiro aka even:
> - last package sent on 20th March '09
> - last closed bug on 13th April '09
> - last post on bbs 18th April '09
>
> Aaron Schaefer aka elasticdog:
> - last package sent on 14th June '09
> - last closed bug on 22th April '09
> - last post on bbs 19th March '09
How about mailing list posts?
10-31-2009, 11:01 PM
Chris Brannon
even and elasticdog status?
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> Hi TUs,
> I want to see who is working and who is not.
> These TUs are flagged as active but they did nothing in the last 4-6 months.
> What do you think about? Should we start with removal vote?
-1. There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody:
*intentional harm* to the distro.
But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was
inactive.
-- Chris
10-31-2009, 11:07 PM
Angel Velásquez
even and elasticdog status?
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>> Hi TUs,
>> I want to see who is working and who is not.
>> These TUs are flagged as active but they did nothing in the last 4-6 months.
>> What do you think about? Should we start with removal vote?
>
> -1. *There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody:
> *intentional harm* to the distro.
>
> But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was
> inactive.
>
> -- Chris
>
They voted in the SVP process, maybe they are not active at all but
they aren't inactive IMO (sometimes the real life stuff push too much
than usually, in my experience)
--
Angel Velásquez
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Arch Linux Trusted User
Linux Counter: #359909
http://www.angvp.com
10-31-2009, 11:11 PM
Andrea Scarpino
even and elasticdog status?
On 01/11/2009, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1. There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody:
> *intentional harm* to the distro.
>
> But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was
> inactive.
No problem if they are inactive. Everyone can be busy.
But they should flagged theirself as inactive.
We have a TU Bylaws[1] that speak up.
On 01/11/2009, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about mailing list posts?
even sent her last message on 24th September, elasticdog 2 weeks ago.
I believe they will read this message soon and will explain us the situation.
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
10-31-2009, 11:15 PM
Laszlo Papp
even and elasticdog status?
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 01/11/2009, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79@gmail.com> wrote:
>> -1. *There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody:
>> *intentional harm* to the distro.
>>
>> But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was
>> inactive.
> No problem if they are inactive. Everyone can be busy.
> But they should flagged theirself as inactive.
> We have a TU Bylaws[1] that speak up.
>
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html
>
> --
> Andrea `bash` Scarpino
> Arch Linux Developer
>
On 01/11/2009, Laszlo Papp <djszapi@archlinux.us> wrote:
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-May/004850.html
>
Well, this message was sent 5 months ago and I do not know what we must do now.
Anyway someone must remember her to update Trusted Users page[1] next time.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 01/11/2009, Laszlo Papp <djszapi@archlinux.us> wrote:
>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-May/004850.html
>>
> Well, this message was sent 5 months ago and I do not know what we must do now.
> Anyway someone must remember her to update Trusted Users page[1] next time.
>
> [1] http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Trusted_Users
>
> --
> Andrea `bash` Scarpino
> Arch Linux Developer
>
Yeah, I agree with you like You, Bardo and others did it in the past
Would it better to sign it on the http://archlinux.org/developers page ?
even and elasticdog status?
