Please see these packages, it contains a builded packages, binaries and some sources.

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4011
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17880
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8064
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5338
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14866
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=199

...and there are many more.

I am preparing another list, but much more extensive. But first I have a question: in unsupported the packages.tar.gz may contain "tarballs" of the sources?, because I see that there are
several that have this? (some are a mistake of the user that uploaded that and in array of source download of the homepage) In the AUR Guidelines there is no reference to this.



--
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
http://www.djgera.com.ar
KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

Nope. Just the buildscript and any necessary requirements that cannot be
downloaded by the user. You won't be stopping soon, that I can assure you.
There are bound to be such packages around..

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:16:28 +0100
> Subject: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
> From: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
>

> Please see these packages, it contains a builded packages, binaries
> and some sources.
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4011
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17880
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8064
> * http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=199
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5338
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14866
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=199
>
> ...and there are many more.
>
> I am preparing another list, but much more extensive. But first I have
> a question: in unsupported the packages.tar.gz may contain "tarballs"
> of the sources?, because I see that there are several that have this?
> (some are a mistake of the user that uploaded that and in array of
> source download of the homepage) In the AUR Guidelines there is no
> reference to this.
>
>
>
> --
> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera )
> http://www.djgera.com.ar
> KeyID: 0x1B8C330D
> Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 *76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
>
>
Hello,

findwild was mine, I did a fresh upload, that fixed it.
I deleted micq (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928) because
last update was 2006 and the maintainer did not respond to the comments
of several users (program was renamed to climm).

For *the other packages I left a comment. The
AUR comment page looks strange. Where I expect the comment button, there
is the word "poop".
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 is okay, there are only
small files uploaded.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 is okay, too.
Thank you for notification.
Regards Stefan

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:03:50AM +0100, stefan-husmann@t-online.de wrote:
> findwild was mine, I did a fresh upload, that fixed it.
> I deleted micq (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928) because
> last update was 2006 and the maintainer did not respond to the comments
> of several users (program was renamed to climm).
>
> For *the other packages I left a comment. The
> AUR comment page looks strange. Where I expect the comment button, there
> is the word "poop".
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 is okay, there are only
> small files uploaded.
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 is okay, too.
> Thank you for notification.

I was deleting some of the files. Have a look at the tarballs though.
They're much bigger than your average set of build scripts.

Where are you seeing 'poop'?

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:19:36 +0100
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
> From: Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
> <aur-general@archlinux.org>

> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:03:50AM +0100, stefan-husmann@t-online.de
> wrote:
> > findwild was mine, I did a fresh upload, that fixed it.
> > I deleted micq (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928)
> > because last update was 2006 and the maintainer did not respond to
> > the comments of several users (program was renamed to climm).
> >
> > For *the other packages I left a comment. The
> > AUR comment page looks strange. Where I expect the comment button,
> > there is the word "poop".
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 is okay, there are
> > only small files uploaded.
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 is okay, too.
> > Thank you for notification.
> >
>
> I was deleting some of the files. Have a look at the tarballs though.
> They're much bigger than your average set of build scripts.
>
> Where are you seeing 'poop'?
>
>
The poop is gone, sorry, I do not remember where I saw it..

Regards Stefan

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:36 PM, stefan-husmann@t-online.de
<stefan-husmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>> From: Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com>
>> Where are you seeing 'poop'?
>>
>>
> The poop is gone, sorry, I do not remember where I saw it..

This is the best exchange on this list yet.

If the button text changed, I imagine someone (wizzo?) was testing something

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:39:27 +0100
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
> From: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
> <aur-general@archlinux.org>

> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:36 PM, stefan-husmann@t-online.de
> <stefan-husmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> > > From: Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com>
> > > Where are you seeing 'poop'?
> > >
> > >
> > The poop is gone, sorry, I do not remember where I saw it..
>
> This is the best exchange on this list yet.
>
> If the button text changed, I imagine someone (wizzo?) was testing
> something
>

Oops, I probably should look up words I do not know before posting them.
There may be little children reading this.

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
> Where are you seeing 'poop'?
>
>

I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I
think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the
commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all
comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there.

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:50:18 +0100
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
> From: Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch@gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
> <aur-general@archlinux.org>

> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Where are you seeing 'poop'?
> >
> >
>
> I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I
> think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the
> commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all
> comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there.
>
Thank you, at least I am not hallucinating.

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:50:18PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Where are you seeing 'poop'?
>
> I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I
> think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the
> commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all
> comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there.

Ooops that was me. Pardon.