Please delete the following package from AUR:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19104
It was ported into sourceforge with changing for GIT reversion
control, so SVN handling is not available anymore, and the authors
released a stable version, with a stable snapshot that wasn't
available earlier, and I uploaded into AUR this stable version:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31641
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
11-01-2009, 05:15 AM
Evangelos Foutras
Deletion request
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Laszlo Papp <djszapi@archlinux.us> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please delete the following package from AUR:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19104
>
> It was ported into sourceforge with changing for GIT reversion
> control, so SVN handling is not available anymore, and the authors
> released a stable version, with a stable snapshot that wasn't
> available earlier, and I uploaded into AUR this stable version:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31641
>
> Best Regards,
> Laszlo Papp
Deleted.
Cheers.
11-01-2009, 05:17 AM
Laszlo Papp
Deletion request
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Laszlo Papp <djszapi@archlinux.us> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please delete the following package from AUR:
>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19104
>>
>> It was ported into sourceforge with changing for GIT reversion
>> control, so SVN handling is not available anymore, and the authors
>> released a stable version, with a stable snapshot that wasn't
>> available earlier, and I uploaded into AUR this stable version:
>>
>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31641
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Laszlo Papp
>
> Deleted.
>
> Cheers.
>
Thanks, maybe the same situation:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30511
The author of this package uploaded the this application with the new
GIT version control related AUR package.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
11-08-2009, 08:39 AM
Laszlo Papp
Deletion request
Hello TUs,
The next two packages are with the same application in AUR, I don't
know which one is worth to delete, maybe I prefer lua-expat name to
luaexpat.
Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hello TUs,
>
> The next two packages are with the same application in AUR, I don't
> know which one is worth to delete, maybe I prefer lua-expat name to
> luaexpat.
>
> luaexpat:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13509
>
> lua-expat:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21939
Laszlo,
I prefer the lua-expat name as well, but ...
1. luaexpat is the package under active maintenance.
(lua-expat hasn't been updated since Dec 3, 2008).
2. luaexpat is required by all the prosody packages, whereas lua-expat
is only required by lua-gtk.
Since you maintain lua-gtk, could you please change the dependency
from lua-expat to luaexpat?
Once that is done, I'll go ahead and delete lua-expat.
Regards,
-- Chris
11-08-2009, 05:08 PM
OndÅ™ej KuÄera
Deletion request
Hello,
since version 23, the Ruby mode is included in Emacs itself, therefore
the package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13483
is no longer needed and can be deleted.
deletion request
