Hi,

According to Jan Steffens: "baobab was part of gnome-utils and
upstream split it into its own package with 3.4" and it was in extra
before that.

Removed the AUR package. Thanks for maintaining.

--
Cordially,
*Alexander Rødseth
*Arch Linux Trusted User
*(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

"scribus-ng" is release candidate package with an outdated (old)
version and hasn't been updated for a year now. Plus this outdated
package is the only one of this maintainer, so I guess he doesn't
really want to maintain it.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47919
(note: there is another maintained "release candidate" package,
scribus-rc, no need for both)

"scribus-stable" is outdated, orphan and there's a stable version of
scribus in [extra], therefore this package is nonsense.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35538

Thanks

On 7 April 2012 18:55, rafael ff1 <rafael.f.f1@gmail.com> wrote:
> "scribus-ng" is release candidate package with an outdated (old)
> version and hasn't been updated for a year now. Plus this outdated
> package is the only one of this maintainer, so I guess he doesn't
> really want to maintain it.
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47919
> (note: there is another maintained "release candidate" package,
> scribus-rc, no need for both)
>
> "scribus-stable" is outdated, orphan and there's a stable version of
> scribus in [extra], therefore this package is nonsense.
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35538
>
> Thanks

Thanks, I've merged scribus-ng into scribus-rc and deleted scribus-stable.

Lukas

Hi, please remove [1] because this patches included after 3.1 kernel version

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51329

thanks

--
Xavier Corredor Llano

Hi,

Removed, thanks.

--
Cordially,
*Alexander Rødseth
*Arch Linux Trusted User
*(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

lib32-file [1] is outdated for some time now (it's in version 5.0.4
while 'file' in [core] repo is in version 5.1.1 already), orphan and
no one seems to need or care about this package. IMO, this package has
no use.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43990

Please delete

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:10:08AM -0300, rafael ff1 wrote:
> lib32-file [1] is outdated for some time now (it's in version 5.0.4
> while 'file' in [core] repo is in version 5.1.1 already), orphan and
> no one seems to need or care about this package. IMO, this package has
> no use.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43990
>
> Please delete

Agreed. Makes no sense to keep a lib32 binary. Deleted.

dave

Hi, please delete sst https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50112 There are other packages in the AUR providing the same application (sstreck https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9931 and sstlinux https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50013) which have more votes. Maybe one of those two should be removed as well?

Greetz

Op vrijdag 20 april 2012 20:30:17 schreef Uli Armbruster:
> Hi, please delete sst https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50112 There
> are other packages in the AUR providing the same application (sstreck
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9931 and sstlinux
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50013) which have more votes.
> Maybe one of those two should be removed as well?
>
> Greetz

Maybe you can adopt sstrek since it is orphaned.
then have some discussion with marko-v about sstlinux

and when he agrees then we could merge sstrek and sstlinux into sst since this
is the name given by the developer

if you want we can merge the orphaned one immediatly into sst and then see how
the discussion goes.

--Ike

* Ike Devolder <ike.devolder@gmail.com> [21.04.2012 09:15]:
> Op vrijdag 20 april 2012 20:30:17 schreef Uli Armbruster:
> > Hi, please delete sst https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50112 There
> > are other packages in the AUR providing the same application (sstreck
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9931 and sstlinux
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50013) which have more votes.
> > Maybe one of those two should be removed as well?
> >
> > Greetz
>
> Maybe you can adopt sstrek since it is orphaned.
> then have some discussion with marko-v about sstlinux
>
> and when he agrees then we could merge sstrek and sstlinux into sst since this
> is the name given by the developer
>
> if you want we can merge the orphaned one immediatly into sst and then see how
> the discussion goes.
>
> --Ike

Ok, sounds good to me. I wrote on the comments of sstlinux and adopted sstreck. I'll come back here as soon as marko-v has answered and we have an agreement.