On 2/4/09, Javier Vasquez <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> ... I'm wondering why gphotfs was removed from AUR. Was it due to lack of
> users or lack of maintainers, or because what the packet provided is
> now provided by gphoto2 of libgphoto2?
> Just to find out whether I need my own version of gphotofs, or it's no
> longer needed,
The packet is back in AUR, :-), it was out like for a week or so... I
guess the packet is still required for those using gphotofs (neither
libgfphoto nor gphoto provide gphotofs functionality)...