VOTE: Removal Of xterminus - Page 2

12-23-2007, 08:25 PM

2007/12/23, Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo@gmail.com>:
> This is the vote for the removal of the Trusted User xterminus due to
> unexplained inactivity. Discussion period is over and everybody must
> vote and as per the bylaws this vote requires at least two thirds of
> us to vote in order to meet quorum.

My vote is YES.

--
Giovanni Scafora
Arch Linux Trusted User (voidnull)
http://www.archlinux.org
linuxmania@gmail.com

12-23-2007, 10:02 PM

On Dec 23, 2007 4:24 AM, Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote for the removal of the Trusted User xterminus due to
> unexplained inactivity. Discussion period is over and everybody must
> vote and as per the bylaws this vote requires at least two thirds of
> us to vote in order to meet quorum.

YES

--
Aaron "ElasticDog" Schaefer

12-23-2007, 11:01 PM

Yes.

// jeff
--
. : [ + carpe diem totus tuus + ] : .

12-23-2007, 11:10 PM

12-24-2007, 12:06 AM

On 12/23/07, Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote for the removal of the Trusted User xterminus due to
> unexplained inactivity. Discussion period is over and everybody must
> vote and as per the bylaws this vote requires at least two thirds of
> us to vote in order to meet quorum.
>
> I vote: YES

YES

Bjørn

12-24-2007, 12:51 AM

YES

--
[]'s
Hugo Doria
http://hdoria.archlinux-br.org
GNU/Linux user #359340 - http://counter.li.org

12-24-2007, 03:06 PM

12-25-2007, 01:13 PM

Yes.

Alex

12-25-2007, 08:06 PM

Yes

Firmicus

12-26-2007, 12:38 AM

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:24:45 +0900
"Callan Barrett" <wizzomafizzo@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is the vote for the removal of the Trusted User xterminus due to
> unexplained inactivity. Discussion period is over and everybody must
> vote and as per the bylaws this vote requires at least two thirds of
> us to vote in order to meet quorum.
>
Yes.