Dan McGee wrote:
> So I just reread this patch after seeing it on Allan's "patches
> pending" wiki page section. TBH it seems OK to me, especially since it
> reduces the number of checks needed later in the script, although I do
> see the benefit of running all these checks when generating checksums.
> So I guess I am OK with merging this even though I think there are a
> few drawbacks- any objections?
Well, I don't know what to add.
It is not a big deal either way, so if you are ok with it, just pull it
pacman-dev mailing list