FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.

» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > ArchLinux > ArchLinux Pacman Development

LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-12-2009, 12:08 PM
Cedric Staniewski
Default makepkg: move pacman calls to a function

Allan McRae wrote:
> Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Cedric Staniewski <cedric@gmx.ca> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Cedric Staniewski <cedric@gmx.ca>
>>> ---
>> Seems pretty reasonable to me; Allan, is this OK?
> I have been thinking about this and its companion patch. I like the
> refactoring of the pacman call into the function but dislike not
> replacing the "pacman -T" call with it.
> If there is a config option for setting the "pacman" binary, and I have
> program that replaces pacman (e.g. the one based on the python alpm
> wrapper should work), then I should not need pacman on my system at all.
> So I prefer the original version where the "pacman -T" call was replaced
> too.

And leave it to the pacman wrapper authors to fix their programs? Sounds
I also prefer the original patch, mainly because it seems 'cleaner' to
me, but being able to replace pacman completely on a system is a valid
reason, too.

Thread Tools

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org